Research for Action

8.0k citations
424 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

    • Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare 12
    • Community Health and Development 11
    • Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health 10
    • Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations 10

Research for Action

316 papers receiving 6.2k citations

Peers

Research for Action
Comparison fields: 5 of 212
  • Applied Psychology 222
  • Education 1.4k
  • Information Systems and Management 310
  • General Health Professions 973
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 472
Replace Compass (United States) with:
Compass (United States) United States
Schulman, Ronca & Bucuvalas United States
United States Coast Guard Academy United States
National Academy of Engineering United States
Open Society Foundations United States
Office of Management United States
American College of Financial Services United States
Carlow University United States
Academy for Educational Development United States
Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture United States
Research for Action relative to Compass (United States) United States Compass (United States)'s profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.1×
Compass (United States) · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Research for Action

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Research for Action. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Research for Action with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Research for Action more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Research for Action

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Research for Action at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Research for Action at the time of their publication.

About Research for Action

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Research for Action have published 424 papers, which have received a total of 8.0k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 26 papers in Safety Research, 72 papers in General Health Professions, 13 papers in Applied Psychology, 21 papers in Health and 38 papers in Clinical Psychology on the topics of HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (16 papers), HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (13 papers), Global Maternal and Child Health (12 papers), Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare (12 papers), Community Health and Development (11 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (10 papers), Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations (10 papers) and Child Nutrition and Water Access (9 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Applied Psychology (222 citations), Education (1.4k citations), Information Systems and Management (310 citations), General Health Professions (973 citations) and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (472 citations). Authors at Research for Action collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Georgia and have published in prestigious journals including PLoS ONE, BMJ Open, Journal of Health Population and Nutrition, Journal of Community Psychology and The Gerontologist. Some of Research for Action's most productive authors include Judith Warren Little, Susan Lee Ivey, P. Wesley Schultz, Kirti Iyengar, Vasant Ranade, Jennifer J. Tabanico, Mark Hall, Elmar Kutsch, Mario Biggeri and Olivia D. Chang.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact