Royal College of Physicians
Impact in
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 10%
- Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
-
- Healthcare Quality and Management
Papers in
-
- Healthcare Quality and Management 92
-
- Health Services Management and Policy 92
- Healthcare Systems and Challenges 53
- Top scholars
- K. G. M. M. AlbertiPaul ZimmetJonathan E. ShawW. I. McDonaldA. G. McKendrickChristopher Michael RobertsNorma O’FlynnHans‐Peter Hartung
- Journals
- Clinical Medicine (161 papers)BMJ (83 papers)The Lancet (57 papers)Age and Ageing (33 papers)Heart (27 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Royal College of Physicians
1.4k papers receiving 50.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 223
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 5.7k
- Health Information Management 1.5k
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 5.6k
- Gastroenterology 1.1k
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 777
Countries citing scholars working at Royal College of Physicians
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Royal College of Physicians. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Royal College of Physicians with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Royal College of Physicians more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Royal College of Physicians
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Royal College of Physicians at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Royal College of Physicians at the time of their publication.
About Royal College of Physicians
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Royal College of Physicians have published 1.5k papers, which have received a total of 50.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 125 papers in Health Information Management, 255 papers in General Health Professions, 333 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 65 papers in Emergency Medicine and 42 papers in Emergency Medical Services on the topics of Innovations in Medical Education (183 papers), Health Services Management and Policy (92 papers), Healthcare Quality and Management (92 papers), Healthcare Systems and Challenges (53 papers), History of Science and Medicine (53 papers), Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (51 papers), Hip and Femur Fractures (46 papers) and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research (38 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Pathology and Forensic Medicine (5.7k citations), Health Information Management (1.5k citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (5.6k citations), Gastroenterology (1.1k citations) and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (777 citations). Authors at Royal College of Physicians collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including Clinical Medicine, BMJ, The Lancet, Age and Ageing and Heart. Some of Royal College of Physicians's most productive authors include K. G. M. M. Alberti, Paul Zimmet, Jonathan E. Shaw, W. I. McDonald, A. G. McKendrick, Christopher Michael Roberts, Norma O’Flynn, Hans‐Peter Hartung, Chris H. Polman and Henry F. McFarland.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.