Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital

11.7k papers receiving 351.5k citations

Peers

Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital
Comparison fields: 5 of 247
  • Molecular Medicine 20.6k
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 7.2k
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 9.9k
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 12.5k
  • Pharmacology 27.8k
Replace Westmead Hospital with:
Westmead Hospital Australia
Princess Alexandra Hospital Australia
Prince of Wales Hospital Australia
Royal North Shore Hospital Australia
Department of Veterans Affairs Australia
Children's Hospital at Westmead Australia
Canberra Hospital Australia
St Vincent's Hospital Sydney Australia
The Alfred Hospital Australia
Concord Repatriation General Hospital Australia
Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital relative to Westmead Hospital Australia Westmead Hospital's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.9×
Westmead Hospital · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital at the time of their publication.

About Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital have published 14.2k papers, which have received a total of 427.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 132 papers in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 400 papers in Emergency Medical Services, 431 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 260 papers in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and 269 papers in Molecular Medicine on the topics of Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (475 papers), Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (268 papers), Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis (251 papers), Acute Myocardial Infarction Research (190 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (175 papers), Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (161 papers), Iron Metabolism and Disorders (151 papers) and Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (138 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Molecular Medicine (20.6k citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (7.2k citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (9.9k citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (12.5k citations) and Pharmacology (27.8k citations). Authors at Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital collaborate with scholars in Australia, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including The Medical Journal of Australia, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Emergency Medicine Australasia and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Some of Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital's most productive authors include David L. Paterson, Jeffrey Lipman, Jason A. Roberts, G. Lorimer Moseley, James G. Scott, Lawrie W. Powell, Michael P. Pender, Joan Webster, Pamela McCombe and Carlos Salomón.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact