Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust

15.4k citations
792 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust

714 papers receiving 15.4k citations

Peers

Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust
Comparison fields: 5 of 196
  • Emergency Medical Services 633
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 566
  • Cancer Research 875
  • Health Informatics 145
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 1.8k
Replace Luton and Dunstable Hospital with:
Luton and Dunstable Hospital United Kingdom
Royal Bolton Hospital United Kingdom
Musgrove Park Hospital United Kingdom
Princess Alexandra Hospital United Kingdom
Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust United Kingdom
Peterborough City Hospital United Kingdom
Northampton General Hospital United Kingdom
West Suffolk Hospital United Kingdom
Bolton NHS Foundation Trust United Kingdom
West Middlesex University Hospital United Kingdom
Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust relative to Luton and Dunstable Hospital United Kingdom Luton and Dunstable Hospital's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.4×
Luton and Dunstable Hospital · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust at the time of their publication.

About Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust have published 792 papers, which have received a total of 15.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 14 papers in Health Informatics, 32 papers in Emergency Medical Services, 143 papers in Surgery, 27 papers in Health Information Management and 28 papers in Ophthalmology on the topics of Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (16 papers), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (15 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (14 papers), Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education (14 papers), Spondyloarthritis Studies and Treatments (14 papers), Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms (13 papers), Healthcare Quality and Management (13 papers) and Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (12 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Emergency Medical Services (633 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (566 citations), Cancer Research (875 citations), Health Informatics (145 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (1.8k citations). Authors at Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including Anaesthesia, Clinical Medicine, Eye, CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology and Emergency Medicine Journal. Some of Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust's most productive authors include Mandy Odell, Emma C. Vaux, Margot Gosney, Ofer Levy, Christina Rita Victor, Simon Yarrow, Stephen A. Copeland, Chandy Verghese, Melanie Gager and Lisa Methven.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact