Raytheon (United States)

175.3k citations
6.8k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Raytheon (United States)

6.4k papers receiving 175.2k citations

Peers

Raytheon (United States)
Comparison fields: 5 of 236
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 28.1k
  • Aerospace Engineering 17.9k
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 36.4k
  • Global and Planetary Change 13k
  • Atmospheric Science 8.1k
Replace MIT Lincoln Laboratory with:
MIT Lincoln Laboratory United States
Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory United States
Northrop Grumman (United States) United States
DEVCOM Army Research Laboratory United States
Lockheed Martin (United States) United States
National Aeronautics and Space Administration United States
Science Applications International Corporation (United States) United States
Langley Research Center United States
United States Naval Academy United States
Leidos (United States) United States
Raytheon (United States) relative to MIT Lincoln Laboratory United States MIT Lincoln Laboratory's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7.3×
MIT Lincoln Laboratory · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Raytheon (United States)

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Raytheon (United States). It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Raytheon (United States) with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Raytheon (United States) more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Raytheon (United States)

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Raytheon (United States) at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Raytheon (United States) at the time of their publication.

About Raytheon (United States)

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Raytheon (United States) have published 6.8k papers, which have received a total of 175.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 125 papers in Instrumentation, 1.3k papers in Aerospace Engineering, 2k papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering, 608 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics and 737 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics on the topics of Advanced Semiconductor Detectors and Materials (342 papers), Radio Frequency Integrated Circuit Design (292 papers), Microwave Engineering and Waveguides (283 papers), Radar Systems and Signal Processing (218 papers), Semiconductor materials and interfaces (192 papers), Target Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks (189 papers), Antenna Design and Analysis (179 papers) and Calibration and Measurement Techniques (174 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Astronomy and Astrophysics (28.1k citations), Aerospace Engineering (17.9k citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (36.4k citations), Global and Planetary Change (13k citations) and Atmospheric Science (8.1k citations). Authors at Raytheon (United States) collaborate with scholars in United States, Germany and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Applied Physics, The Astrophysical Journal, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, Applied Physics Letters and Proceedings of the IEEE. Some of Raytheon (United States)'s most productive authors include William J. Weber, Ernst Schlömann, William C. Brown, Fred E. Daum, M. G. Holland, Claude A. Klein, Samuel S. Blackman, Anna Paladino, T. F. Eck and Alexander Smirnov.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact