Quality Systems (United States)
Impact in
- Medical Laboratory Technology top 10%
-
- Quality and Supply Management
Papers in
- Software 15
- Software Reliability and Analysis Research 11
- Top scholars
- Leon L. ShawKun DaiSteve R. LawrenceLinda R. LaGangaTimothy E. SchmidtChristopher NiezreckiPeter AvitabileTim Schmidt
- Journals
- Metal Finishing (14 papers)SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series (10 papers)International Journal of Molecular Sciences (5 papers)Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) (5 papers)Materials Science and Engineering A (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSpainGermany
In The Last Decade
Quality Systems (United States)
265 papers receiving 5.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 218
- Medical Laboratory Technology 100
- Management Information Systems 457
- Software 207
- Emergency Medical Services 299
- Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 264
Countries citing scholars working at Quality Systems (United States)
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Quality Systems (United States). It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Quality Systems (United States) with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Quality Systems (United States) more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Quality Systems (United States)
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Quality Systems (United States) at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Quality Systems (United States) at the time of their publication.
About Quality Systems (United States)
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Quality Systems (United States) have published 333 papers, which have received a total of 6.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 15 papers in Software, 3 papers in Medical Laboratory Technology, 12 papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, 15 papers in Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality and 14 papers in Management Information Systems on the topics of Software Engineering Research (15 papers), Optical measurement and interference techniques (14 papers), Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control (12 papers), Software Reliability and Analysis Research (11 papers), Structural Health Monitoring Techniques (9 papers), Quality and Supply Management (9 papers), Manufacturing Process and Optimization (8 papers) and Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (8 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Medical Laboratory Technology (100 citations), Management Information Systems (457 citations), Software (207 citations), Emergency Medical Services (299 citations) and Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (264 citations). Authors at Quality Systems (United States) collaborate with scholars in United States, Spain and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including Metal Finishing, SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series, International Journal of Molecular Sciences, Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) and Materials Science and Engineering A. Some of Quality Systems (United States)'s most productive authors include Leon L. Shaw, Kun Dai, Steve R. Lawrence, Linda R. LaGanga, Timothy E. Schmidt, Christopher Niezrecki, Peter Avitabile, Tim Schmidt, Kaustav Banerjee and A. Mehrotra.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.