Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency

21.8k citations
1.8k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency

1.6k papers receiving 21.1k citations

Peers

Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency
Comparison fields: 5 of 185
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 4.0k
  • Infectious Diseases 6.0k
  • Animal Science and Zoology 3.3k
  • Molecular Medicine 1.2k
  • Endocrinology 1.1k
Replace Korea National Institute of Health with:
Korea National Institute of Health South Korea
Shanghai Veterinary Research Institute China
Poultry Research Institute China
Harbin Veterinary Research Institute China
Institut Pasteur of Shanghai China
Beijing Institute of Genomics China
Institute of Special Animal and Plant Sciences China
China Animal Disease Control Center China
Taishan Medical University China
Chinese National Human Genome Center at Shanghai China
Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency relative to Korea National Institute of Health South Korea Korea National Institute of Health's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.5×
Korea National Institute of Health · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency at the time of their publication.

About Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency have published 1.8k papers, which have received a total of 21.8k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 392 papers in Agronomy and Crop Science, 456 papers in Infectious Diseases, 247 papers in Animal Science and Zoology, 109 papers in Endocrinology and 87 papers in Molecular Medicine on the topics of Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology (379 papers), Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology (240 papers), Vector-Borne Animal Diseases (229 papers), Animal Virus Infections Studies (211 papers), Viral Infections and Immunology Research (209 papers), Influenza Virus Research Studies (174 papers), Viral Infections and Vectors (126 papers) and Insect and Pesticide Research (105 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Agronomy and Crop Science (4.0k citations), Infectious Diseases (6.0k citations), Animal Science and Zoology (3.3k citations), Molecular Medicine (1.2k citations) and Endocrinology (1.1k citations). Authors at Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency collaborate with scholars in South Korea, United States and Vietnam and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Veterinary Science, Veterinary Microbiology, Vaccines, Viruses and Poultry Science. Some of Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency's most productive authors include Suk‐Kyung Lim, Youn‐Jeong Lee, Jae‐Young Song, Sang‐Moo Kang, Jong-Hyeon Park, Yong‐Kuk Kwon, Dong-Jun An, Dongmi Kwak, Min-Goo Seo and Suk-Chan Jung.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact