Positive Action

12.7k citations
248 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Positive Action

191 papers receiving 11.2k citations

Peers

Positive Action
Comparison fields: 5 of 206
  • Applied Psychology 1.9k
  • Social Psychology 5.2k
  • Clinical Psychology 3.6k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.4k
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 899
Replace Alberta Bible College with:
Alberta Bible College Canada
Realistic Education in Action Coalition to Foster Health United States
Santa Clara County Behavioral Health Services United States
Seattle Epidemiologic Information and Research Center United States
Sofia University United States
Paul Hastings United States
University Child Development School United States
Lewis Clark State College United States
Institute for Scientific Analysis United States
nView Medical (United States) United States
Positive Action relative to Alberta Bible College Canada Alberta Bible College's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.2×
Alberta Bible College · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Positive Action

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Positive Action. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Positive Action with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Positive Action more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Positive Action

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Positive Action at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Positive Action at the time of their publication.

About Positive Action

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Positive Action have published 248 papers, which have received a total of 12.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 18 papers in Applied Psychology, 42 papers in Social Psychology, 38 papers in Clinical Psychology, 2 papers in General Psychology and 24 papers in Infectious Diseases on the topics of HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (20 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (16 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (10 papers), HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (9 papers), Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (8 papers), Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations (7 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (7 papers) and Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (6 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Applied Psychology (1.9k citations), Social Psychology (5.2k citations), Clinical Psychology (3.6k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.4k citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (899 citations). Authors at Positive Action collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Australia and have published in prestigious journals including The Journal of Positive Psychology, Journal of Thoracic Oncology, Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, AIDS and Women s Health Issues. Some of Positive Action's most productive authors include Robert Biswas‐Diener, Shigehiro Oishi, Ed Diener, William Tov, Chu Kim‐Prieto, Derrick Wirtz, Dongwon Choi, P. Alex Linley, Martin E. P. Seligman and Tayyab Rashid.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact