Public Library of Science

6.0k citations
342 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Public Library of Science

260 papers receiving 4.3k citations

Peers

Public Library of Science
Comparison fields: 5 of 224
  • Information Systems and Management 556
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 509
  • Library and Information Sciences 90
  • Communication 275
  • Information Systems 673
Replace Box (United States) with:
Box (United States) United States
California Digital Library United States
Cal Poly Corporation United States
Protein Metrics (United States) United States
IDEO (United States) United States
University of Western States United States
Paul Hastings United States
Westminster University United States
Fistula Foundation United States
Benchmark Research (United States) United States
Public Library of Science relative to Box (United States) United States Box (United States)'s profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13.1×
Box (United States) · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Public Library of Science

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Public Library of Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Public Library of Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Public Library of Science more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Public Library of Science

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Public Library of Science at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Public Library of Science at the time of their publication.

About Public Library of Science

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Public Library of Science have published 342 papers, which have received a total of 6.0k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 16 papers in Library and Information Sciences, 36 papers in Information Systems and Management, 34 papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, 45 papers in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis and 9 papers in Conservation on the topics of Climate Change and Health Impacts (43 papers), Air Quality and Health Impacts (38 papers), scientometrics and bibliometrics research (29 papers), Research Data Management Practices (23 papers), Global Health Care Issues (21 papers), Academic Publishing and Open Access (18 papers), Scientific Computing and Data Management (16 papers) and Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology (13 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Information Systems and Management (556 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (509 citations), Library and Information Sciences (90 citations), Communication (275 citations) and Information Systems (673 citations). Authors at Public Library of Science collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Brazil and have published in prestigious journals including PLoS Biology, The Lancet, PLoS Medicine, PLoS ONE and Nature. Some of Public Library of Science's most productive authors include PR Hills, Lauren A. Richardson, Martin Fenner, Liza Gross, Véronique Kiermer, Iain Hrynaszkiewicz, Gary S. Collins, Christopher J L Murray, John Grove and Gretchen A Stevens.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact