Public Library of Science

7.9k citations
390 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Public Library of Science

316 papers receiving 6.0k citations

Peers

Public Library of Science
Comparison fields: 5 of 230
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 783
  • Information Systems and Management 607
  • Health Informatics 80
  • Library and Information Sciences 70
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 84
Replace McKesson (United States) with:
McKesson (United States) United States
Protein Metrics (United States) United States
Box (United States) United States
GfK (United States) United States
St. Joseph Health System United States
City College of San Francisco United States
Interdisciplinary Scientific Research United States
Healthwise United States
Benchmark Research (United States) United States
Oregon State University Cascades United States
Public Library of Science relative to McKesson (United States) United States McKesson (United States)'s profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.8×
McKesson (United States) · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Public Library of Science

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Public Library of Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Public Library of Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Public Library of Science more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Public Library of Science

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Public Library of Science at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Public Library of Science at the time of their publication.

About Public Library of Science

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Public Library of Science have published 390 papers, which have received a total of 7.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 15 papers in Library and Information Sciences, 53 papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, 48 papers in Information Systems and Management, 57 papers in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis and 8 papers in Conservation on the topics of Climate Change and Health Impacts (48 papers), Air Quality and Health Impacts (47 papers), scientometrics and bibliometrics research (41 papers), Academic Publishing and Open Access (29 papers), Research Data Management Practices (23 papers), Global Health Care Issues (23 papers), Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology (19 papers) and Ethics in Clinical Research (19 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (783 citations), Information Systems and Management (607 citations), Health Informatics (80 citations), Library and Information Sciences (70 citations) and Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (84 citations). Authors at Public Library of Science collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Denmark and have published in prestigious journals including PLoS Biology, PLoS Medicine, The Lancet, PLoS ONE and Nature. Some of Public Library of Science's most productive authors include PR Hills, Liza Gross, Lauren A. Richardson, Martin H Fenner, Véronique Kiermer, Gary S. Collins, Iain Hrynaszkiewicz, Ana Marušić, Fiona Godlee and Colin Douglas Mathers.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact