Public Health – Seattle & King County

60.5k citations
1.7k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Public Health – Seattle & King County

1.4k papers receiving 49.4k citations

Peers

Public Health – Seattle & King County
Comparison fields: 5 of 230
  • Emergency Medicine 10.8k
  • Microbiology 5.6k
  • Infectious Diseases 10.2k
  • Epidemiology 12.3k
  • General Health Professions 7.3k
Replace BC Centre for Disease Control with:
BC Centre for Disease Control Canada
Gates Foundation United States
Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation United States
Washington State Department of Health United States
Centre for Advancing Health Outcomes Canada
California Health and Human Services Agency United States
Santa Clara Valley Medical Center United States
San Francisco Department of Public Health United States
Kaiser Permanente Oakland Medical Center United States
Providence Health Care Canada
Public Health – Seattle & King County relative to BC Centre for Disease Control Canada BC Centre for Disease Control's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×14.1×
BC Centre for Disease Control · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Public Health – Seattle & King County

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Public Health – Seattle & King County. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Public Health – Seattle & King County with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Public Health – Seattle & King County more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Public Health – Seattle & King County

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Public Health – Seattle & King County at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Public Health – Seattle & King County at the time of their publication.

About Public Health – Seattle & King County

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Public Health – Seattle & King County have published 1.7k papers, which have received a total of 60.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 189 papers in Microbiology, 235 papers in Emergency Medicine, 326 papers in Infectious Diseases, 52 papers in Virology and 354 papers in Epidemiology on the topics of HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (209 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (201 papers), Reproductive tract infections research (177 papers), HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (147 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (61 papers), Syphilis Diagnosis and Treatment (60 papers), Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology (59 papers) and Homelessness and Social Issues (46 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Emergency Medicine (10.8k citations), Microbiology (5.6k citations), Infectious Diseases (10.2k citations), Epidemiology (12.3k citations) and General Health Professions (7.3k citations). Authors at Public Health – Seattle & King County collaborate with scholars in United States, Canada and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Resuscitation, Clinical Infectious Diseases, American Journal of Public Health and The Journal of Infectious Diseases. Some of Public Health – Seattle & King County's most productive authors include Mickey S. Eisenberg, Matthew R. Golden, Thomas D. Rea, JAMES KRIEGER, H. Hunter Handsfield, Richard O. Cummins, Holly Hagan, D L Higgins, Hanne Thiede and Mary Pat Larsen.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact