Philips (United States)
Impact in
-
- Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
- Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
- Condensed Matter Physics top 5%
Papers in
-
- Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications 431
- Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications 341
- Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography 206
- Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics 187
- Radiation 329
- Top scholars
- G. BlasseJ. SmitM. D. PashleyG.H. JonkerF.N. HoogeR. N. BhargavaA.J. BosmanE. S. Rittner
- Journals
- Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (136 papers)Journal of Applied Physics (116 papers)Applied Physics Letters (107 papers)Medical Physics (95 papers)Physics Letters A (83 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlandsFinland
In The Last Decade
Philips (United States)
5.9k papers receiving 166.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 246
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 25.3k
- Condensed Matter Physics 10.3k
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 15.9k
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 48.3k
- Radiation 7.1k
Countries citing scholars working at Philips (United States)
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Philips (United States). It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Philips (United States) with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philips (United States) more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Philips (United States)
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Philips (United States) at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Philips (United States) at the time of their publication.
About Philips (United States)
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Philips (United States) have published 6.6k papers, which have received a total of 181.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 1.2k papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, 329 papers in Radiation, 1.7k papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering, 877 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 1.1k papers in Biomedical Engineering on the topics of Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (431 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (341 papers), Semiconductor materials and devices (293 papers), Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging (235 papers), Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices (229 papers), Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography (206 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (187 papers) and Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications (180 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (25.3k citations), Condensed Matter Physics (10.3k citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (15.9k citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (48.3k citations) and Radiation (7.1k citations). Authors at Philips (United States) collaborate with scholars in United States, Netherlands and Finland and have published in prestigious journals including Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Journal of Applied Physics, Applied Physics Letters, Medical Physics and Physics Letters A. Some of Philips (United States)'s most productive authors include G. Blasse, J. Smit, M. D. Pashley, G.H. Jonker, F.N. Hooge, R. N. Bhargava, A.J. Bosman, E. S. Rittner, J. Hornstra and M Sparnaay.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.