PHENIX laboratory

32.2k citations
1.1k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

PHENIX laboratory

993 papers receiving 31.4k citations

Peers

PHENIX laboratory
Comparison fields: 5 of 194
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 6.8k
  • Biomaterials 3.8k
  • Electrochemistry 1.7k
  • Catalysis 1.8k
  • Polymers and Plastics 2.8k
Replace Laboratoire Interfaces et Systèmes Électrochimiques with:
Laboratoire Interfaces et Systèmes Électrochimiques France
Interfaces, Confinement, Matériaux et Nanostructures France
Institut Rayonnement-Matière de Saclay France
Laboratoire de Chimie Moléculaire et Thioorganique France
Institut des Molécules et Matériaux du Mans France
AkzoNobel (Netherlands) Netherlands
Royal Institution of Great Britain United Kingdom
CEA Le Ripault France
Chimie et Interdisciplinarité, Synthèse, Analyse, Modélisation France
École Nationale Supérieure de Chimie, de Biologie et de Physique France
PHENIX laboratory relative to Laboratoire Interfaces et Systèmes Électrochimiques France Laboratoire Interfaces et Systèmes Électrochimiques's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Laboratoire Interfaces et Systèmes Électrochimiques · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at PHENIX laboratory

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at PHENIX laboratory. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at PHENIX laboratory with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites PHENIX laboratory more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at PHENIX laboratory

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with PHENIX laboratory at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with PHENIX laboratory at the time of their publication.

About PHENIX laboratory

In recent decades, authors affiliated with PHENIX laboratory have published 1.1k papers, which have received a total of 32.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 38 papers in Filtration and Separation, 63 papers in Electrochemistry, 89 papers in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, 57 papers in Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes and 61 papers in Catalysis on the topics of Advancements in Battery Materials (146 papers), Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies (114 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (84 papers), Electrostatics and Colloid Interactions (75 papers), Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication (74 papers), Electrochemical Analysis and Applications (63 papers), Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery (63 papers) and Ionic liquids properties and applications (60 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (6.8k citations), Biomaterials (3.8k citations), Electrochemistry (1.7k citations), Catalysis (1.8k citations) and Polymers and Plastics (2.8k citations). Authors at PHENIX laboratory collaborate with scholars in France, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including The Journal of Chemical Physics, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, Nuclear Physics A, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics and Langmuir. Some of PHENIX laboratory's most productive authors include Jean‐Pierre Simonin, Mathieu Salanne, Benjamin Rotenberg, C. Julien, A. Mauger, Patrice Simon, Karim Zaghib, Pierre‐Louis Taberna, Ali Abou‐Hassan and Katsuhiko Naoi.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact