Program for Appropriate Technology in Health

89.4k citations
2.3k papers ·

Impact in

    • Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology
  • Health top 2%
    • Intimate Partner and Family Violence
    • Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy

Papers in

Program for Appropriate Technology in Health

2.0k papers receiving 78.5k citations

Peers

Program for Appropriate Technology in Health
Comparison fields: 5 of 237
  • Infectious Diseases 19.2k
  • Health 8.3k
  • Microbiology 6.0k
  • Epidemiology 23.6k
  • Endocrinology 3.1k
Replace BC Centre for Disease Control with:
BC Centre for Disease Control Canada
Gates Foundation United States
Public Health – Seattle & King County United States
Infectious Disease Research Institute United States
Center for Infectious Disease Research United States
San Francisco Department of Public Health United States
San Francisco Foundation United States
Providence Portland Medical Center United States
Global Brain Health Institute United States
The Lundquist Institute United States
Program for Appropriate Technology in Health relative to BC Centre for Disease Control Canada BC Centre for Disease Control's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.8×
BC Centre for Disease Control · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Program for Appropriate Technology in Health

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Program for Appropriate Technology in Health. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Program for Appropriate Technology in Health with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Program for Appropriate Technology in Health more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Program for Appropriate Technology in Health

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Program for Appropriate Technology in Health at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Program for Appropriate Technology in Health at the time of their publication.

About Program for Appropriate Technology in Health

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Program for Appropriate Technology in Health have published 2.3k papers, which have received a total of 89.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 536 papers in Infectious Diseases, 187 papers in Health, 128 papers in Microbiology, 631 papers in Epidemiology and 104 papers in Endocrinology on the topics of Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology (265 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (204 papers), Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (174 papers), Malaria Research and Control (160 papers), Influenza Virus Research Studies (105 papers), Child Nutrition and Water Access (101 papers), Global Maternal and Child Health (101 papers) and Mosquito-borne diseases and control (96 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Infectious Diseases (19.2k citations), Health (8.3k citations), Microbiology (6.0k citations), Epidemiology (23.6k citations) and Endocrinology (3.1k citations). Authors at Program for Appropriate Technology in Health collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Switzerland and have published in prestigious journals including Vaccine, PLoS ONE, Malaria Journal, The Journal of Infectious Diseases and International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. Some of Program for Appropriate Technology in Health's most productive authors include Mary Ellsberg, Lori Heise, Charlotte Watts, Claudia García‐Moreno, Henrica A. F. M. Jansen, J. Thomas Grayston, A. Duncan Steele, Vivien Tsu, Paul Yager and Kathleen M. Neuzil.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact