Oregon Research Institute
Impact in
- General Decision Sciences top 0.5%
- Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Clinical Psychology top 1%
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Eating Disorders and Behaviors
- Personality Traits and Psychology
Papers in
-
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development 304
- Eating Disorders and Behaviors 192
- Personality Traits and Psychology 90
- Physiology 335
- Smoking Behavior and Cessation 266
- Top scholars
- Lewis R. GoldbergPeter M. LewinsohnAmos TverskyJohn Robert SeeleyEric SticePaul RohdeRussell E. GlasgowPaul Slovic
- Journals
- Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (53 papers)Nicotine & Tobacco Research (49 papers)Prevention Science (48 papers)Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (41 papers)Journal of Abnormal Psychology (39 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Oregon Research Institute
2.2k papers receiving 171.9k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 233
- General Decision Sciences 8.7k
- Clinical Psychology 52.6k
- Applied Psychology 5.6k
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 12.6k
- Physiology 15.1k
Countries citing scholars working at Oregon Research Institute
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Oregon Research Institute. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Oregon Research Institute with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Oregon Research Institute more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Oregon Research Institute
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Oregon Research Institute at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Oregon Research Institute at the time of their publication.
About Oregon Research Institute
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Oregon Research Institute have published 2.2k papers, which have received a total of 171.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 725 papers in Clinical Psychology, 335 papers in Physiology, 69 papers in Applied Psychology, 178 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 34 papers in General Decision Sciences on the topics of Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (304 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (266 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (209 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (192 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (116 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (114 papers), Diabetes Management and Education (104 papers) and Personality Traits and Psychology (90 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on General Decision Sciences (8.7k citations), Clinical Psychology (52.6k citations), Applied Psychology (5.6k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (12.6k citations) and Physiology (15.1k citations). Authors at Oregon Research Institute collaborate with scholars in United States, Australia and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, Nicotine & Tobacco Research, Prevention Science, Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry and Journal of Abnormal Psychology. Some of Oregon Research Institute's most productive authors include Lewis R. Goldberg, Peter M. Lewinsohn, Amos Tversky, John Robert Seeley, Eric Stice, Paul Rohde, Russell E. Glasgow, Paul Slovic, Daniel J. Kahneman and Anthony Biglan.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.