National Trust for Nature Conservation
Impact in
-
- Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation
-
- Species Distribution and Climate Change
Papers in
- Ecology 164
- Wildlife Ecology and Conservation 146
- Avian ecology and behavior 8
-
- Species Distribution and Climate Change 8
- Top scholars
- Per WeggeNaresh SubediBabu Ram LamichhaneChiranjibi Prasad PokheralShant Raj JnawaliMorten OddenMadhu ChetriAdrian C. Newton
- Journals
- Ecology and Evolution (18 papers)Global Ecology and Conservation (17 papers)Oryx (14 papers)Journal for Nature Conservation (6 papers)European Journal of Wildlife Research (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- NepalUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
National Trust for Nature Conservation
245 papers receiving 4.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
- Ecology 2.4k
- Ecological Modeling 211
- Global and Planetary Change 555
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 245
- Forestry 49
Countries citing scholars working at National Trust for Nature Conservation
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at National Trust for Nature Conservation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at National Trust for Nature Conservation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Trust for Nature Conservation more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at National Trust for Nature Conservation
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with National Trust for Nature Conservation at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with National Trust for Nature Conservation at the time of their publication.
About National Trust for Nature Conservation
In recent decades, authors affiliated with National Trust for Nature Conservation have published 284 papers, which have received a total of 4.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 164 papers in Ecology, 8 papers in Ecological Modeling, 42 papers in Global and Planetary Change, 15 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation and 5 papers in Forestry on the topics of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (146 papers), Amphibian and Reptile Biology (22 papers), Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (18 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (10 papers), Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology (9 papers), Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants Studies (9 papers), Avian ecology and behavior (8 papers) and Species Distribution and Climate Change (8 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Ecology (2.4k citations), Ecological Modeling (211 citations), Global and Planetary Change (555 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (245 citations) and Forestry (49 citations). Authors at National Trust for Nature Conservation collaborate with scholars in Nepal, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Ecology and Evolution, Global Ecology and Conservation, Oryx, Journal for Nature Conservation and European Journal of Wildlife Research. Some of National Trust for Nature Conservation's most productive authors include Per Wegge, Naresh Subedi, Babu Ram Lamichhane, Chiranjibi Prasad Pokheral, Shant Raj Jnawali, Morten Odden, Madhu Chetri, Adrian C. Newton, Peter A. Furley and Maheshwar Dhakal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.