National Trust for Nature Conservation
Impact in
- Ecological Modeling top 10%
- Species Distribution and Climate Change
-
- Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Papers in
-
- Species Distribution and Climate Change 73
- Ecology 242
- Wildlife Ecology and Conservation 198
- Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation 30
- Top scholars
- Per WeggeNaresh SubediBabu Ram LamichhaneShant Raj JnawaliChiranjibi Prasad PokheralMorten OddenUday SharmaBhim Gurung
- Journals
- Ecology and Evolution (24 papers)Global Ecology and Conservation (20 papers)Oryx (18 papers)PLoS ONE (8 papers)Scientific Reports (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- NepalUnited StatesIndia
In The Last Decade
National Trust for Nature Conservation
333 papers receiving 5.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 160
- Ecological Modeling 895
- Ecology 3.3k
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 1.1k
- Small Animals 472
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 685
Countries citing scholars working at National Trust for Nature Conservation
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at National Trust for Nature Conservation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at National Trust for Nature Conservation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Trust for Nature Conservation more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at National Trust for Nature Conservation
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with National Trust for Nature Conservation at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with National Trust for Nature Conservation at the time of their publication.
About National Trust for Nature Conservation
In recent decades, authors affiliated with National Trust for Nature Conservation have published 399 papers, which have received a total of 5.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 73 papers in Ecological Modeling, 242 papers in Ecology, 67 papers in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, 62 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation and 77 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics on the topics of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (198 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (73 papers), Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology (61 papers), Bat Biology and Ecology Studies (55 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (35 papers), Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (34 papers), Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation (30 papers) and Human-Animal Interaction Studies (29 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Ecological Modeling (895 citations), Ecology (3.3k citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (1.1k citations), Small Animals (472 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (685 citations). Authors at National Trust for Nature Conservation collaborate with scholars in Nepal, United States and India and have published in prestigious journals including Ecology and Evolution, Global Ecology and Conservation, Oryx, PLoS ONE and Scientific Reports. Some of National Trust for Nature Conservation's most productive authors include Per Wegge, Naresh Subedi, Babu Ram Lamichhane, Shant Raj Jnawali, Chiranjibi Prasad Pokheral, Morten Odden, Uday Sharma, Bhim Gurung, Madhu Chetri and Jhamak Bahadur Karki.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.