NSWC Dahlgren Division

17k citations
1.2k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

NSWC Dahlgren Division

1.1k papers receiving 17k citations

Peers

NSWC Dahlgren Division
Comparison fields: 5 of 205
  • Aerospace Engineering 2.9k
  • Oceanography 799
  • Artificial Intelligence 2.4k
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 469
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics 50
Replace United States Department of Commerce with:
United States Department of Commerce United States
BAE Systems (United States) United States
Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency United States
Arthur D. Little (United States) United States
National Institute of Aerospace United States
Naval Undersea Warfare Center United States
United States Army Research Office United States
Computer Sciences Corporation (United States) United States
CUNY Advanced Science Research Center United States
Kettering University United States
NSWC Dahlgren Division relative to United States Department of Commerce United States United States Department of Commerce's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.6×
United States Department of Commerce · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at NSWC Dahlgren Division

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at NSWC Dahlgren Division. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at NSWC Dahlgren Division with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites NSWC Dahlgren Division more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at NSWC Dahlgren Division

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with NSWC Dahlgren Division at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with NSWC Dahlgren Division at the time of their publication.

About NSWC Dahlgren Division

In recent decades, authors affiliated with NSWC Dahlgren Division have published 1.2k papers, which have received a total of 17k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 258 papers in Aerospace Engineering, 10 papers in Acoustics and Ultrasonics, 62 papers in Oceanography, 119 papers in Control and Systems Engineering and 158 papers in Artificial Intelligence on the topics of Target Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks (77 papers), High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior (60 papers), Electromagnetic Compatibility and Measurements (55 papers), Pulsed Power Technology Applications (48 papers), Radar Systems and Signal Processing (48 papers), Guidance and Control Systems (45 papers), Underwater Acoustics Research (43 papers) and Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics (40 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Aerospace Engineering (2.9k citations), Oceanography (799 citations), Artificial Intelligence (2.4k citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (469 citations) and Acoustics and Ultrasonics (50 citations). Authors at NSWC Dahlgren Division collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics and Journal of Applied Physics. Some of NSWC Dahlgren Division's most productive authors include William Dale Blair, David J. Marchette, Ernest J. Ohlmeyer, RICHARD G. AMES, Allison M. Okamura, Carey E. Priebe, Willis Mock, John Edward Gray, Ali T. Alouani and Gregory A. Watson.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact