National Natural Science Foundation of China

50.4k citations
3.2k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

    • Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis 26
    • Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment 35

National Natural Science Foundation of China

2.6k papers receiving 39.6k citations

Peers

National Natural Science Foundation of China
Comparison fields: 5 of 244
  • Hepatology 1.7k
  • Surgery 6.1k
  • Atmospheric Science 2.7k
  • Cancer Research 1.8k
  • Global and Planetary Change 2.8k
Replace Hebei University with:
Hebei University China
Minzu University of China China
North China University of Science and Technology China
University of Jinan China
Liaocheng University China
Shandong University of Aeronautics China
Beijing Chaoyang Emergency Medical Center China
Peking University International Hospital China
Inner Mongolia University China
Yantai University China
National Natural Science Foundation of China relative to Hebei University China Hebei University's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Hebei University · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at National Natural Science Foundation of China

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at National Natural Science Foundation of China. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at National Natural Science Foundation of China with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Natural Science Foundation of China more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at National Natural Science Foundation of China

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with National Natural Science Foundation of China at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with National Natural Science Foundation of China at the time of their publication.

About National Natural Science Foundation of China

In recent decades, authors affiliated with National Natural Science Foundation of China have published 3.2k papers, which have received a total of 50.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 79 papers in Hepatology, 355 papers in Surgery, 179 papers in Oncology, 120 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine and 90 papers in Neurology on the topics of Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment (35 papers), Hepatitis B Virus Studies (34 papers), Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications (29 papers), Conducting polymers and applications (28 papers), Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis (28 papers), Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (28 papers), Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (27 papers) and Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis (26 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Hepatology (1.7k citations), Surgery (6.1k citations), Atmospheric Science (2.7k citations), Cancer Research (1.8k citations) and Global and Planetary Change (2.8k citations). Authors at National Natural Science Foundation of China collaborate with scholars in China, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including World Journal of Gastroenterology, Medicine, Chinese Journal of Chemistry, Spine and Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. Some of National Natural Science Foundation of China's most productive authors include Yunfeng Luo, Surabi Menon, Larissa Nazarenko, James E. Hansen, Han Ma, Hongliang Zhang, Jinghai Li, Aiping Zhang, Guanmin Liao and Xiaoyun Yu.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact