National Research Institute of Chinese Medicine

56.7k citations
1.9k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

National Research Institute of Chinese Medicine

1.8k papers receiving 52.1k citations

Peers

National Research Institute of Chinese Medicine
Comparison fields: 5 of 216
  • Pharmacology 7.1k
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 6.4k
  • Pharmacology 10.8k
  • Toxicology 1.9k
  • Biochemistry 2.9k
Replace Tajen University with:
Tajen University Taiwan
Agricultural Biotechnology Research Center, Academia Sinica Taiwan
ZheJiang Institute For Food and Drug Control China
State Key Laboratory of Natural Medicine China
National Center for Drug Screening China
Shanghai Institute of Pharmaceutical Industry China
Food Industry Research and Development Institute Taiwan
Jiangsu Provincial Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine China
Zhejiang Pharmaceutical College China
Shanghai Innovative Research Center of Traditional Chinese Medicine China
National Research Institute of Chinese Medicine relative to Tajen University Taiwan Tajen University's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.5×
Tajen University · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at National Research Institute of Chinese Medicine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at National Research Institute of Chinese Medicine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at National Research Institute of Chinese Medicine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Research Institute of Chinese Medicine more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at National Research Institute of Chinese Medicine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with National Research Institute of Chinese Medicine at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with National Research Institute of Chinese Medicine at the time of their publication.

About National Research Institute of Chinese Medicine

In recent decades, authors affiliated with National Research Institute of Chinese Medicine have published 1.9k papers, which have received a total of 56.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 238 papers in Pharmacology, 210 papers in Complementary and alternative medicine, 394 papers in Pharmacology, 71 papers in Toxicology and 3 papers in Drug Discovery on the topics of Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (248 papers), Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (201 papers), Fungal Biology and Applications (105 papers), Pharmacological Effects of Natural Compounds (86 papers), Marine Sponges and Natural Products (82 papers), Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae (78 papers), Bioactive Compounds and Antitumor Agents (70 papers) and Traditional Chinese Medicine Analysis (70 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Pharmacology (7.1k citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (6.4k citations), Pharmacology (10.8k citations), Toxicology (1.9k citations) and Biochemistry (2.9k citations). Authors at National Research Institute of Chinese Medicine collaborate with scholars in Taiwan, United States and Philippines and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Natural Products, Planta Medica, Journal of Ethnopharmacology, Phytochemistry and Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin. Some of National Research Institute of Chinese Medicine's most productive authors include Tung‐Hu Tsai, Chieh‐Fu Chen, Yao‐Haur Kuo, Yun‐Lian Lin, Lie-Chwen Lin, Yuh‐Chiang Shen, Yueh‐Hsiung Kuo, Chieh-Fu Chen, Wen‐Fei Chiou and Cheng‐Jen Chou.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact