Norwegian Computing Center

42.5k citations
1.3k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Norwegian Computing Center

1.2k papers receiving 42.5k citations

Peers

Norwegian Computing Center
Comparison fields: 5 of 239
  • Space and Planetary Science 297
  • Analytical Chemistry 2.6k
  • Computational Mathematics 133
  • Media Technology 1.9k
  • Geochemistry and Petrology 1.1k
Replace Helmholtz Institute Freiberg for Resource Technology with:
Helmholtz Institute Freiberg for Resource Technology Germany
Dalle Molle Institute for Artificial Intelligence Research Switzerland
Fraunhofer Institute for Intelligent Analysis and Information Systems Germany
Norwegian Meteorological Institute Norway
Directorate-General Joint Research Centre Belgium
Centre de Morphologie Mathématique - CMM France
Google (Switzerland) Switzerland
Rijkswaterstaat Netherlands
International Research Institute of Stavanger Norway
Battelle Switzerland
Norwegian Computing Center relative to Helmholtz Institute Freiberg for Resource Technology Germany Helmholtz Institute Freiberg for Resource Technology's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15×18.6×
Helmholtz Institute Freiberg for Resource Technology · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Norwegian Computing Center

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Norwegian Computing Center. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Norwegian Computing Center with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Norwegian Computing Center more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Norwegian Computing Center

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Norwegian Computing Center at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Norwegian Computing Center at the time of their publication.

About Norwegian Computing Center

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Norwegian Computing Center have published 1.3k papers, which have received a total of 42.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 84 papers in Geochemistry and Petrology, 32 papers in Human Factors and Ergonomics, 51 papers in Human-Computer Interaction, 60 papers in Media Technology and 7 papers in Space and Planetary Science on the topics of Geological Modeling and Analysis (84 papers), Remote-Sensing Image Classification (51 papers), Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods (39 papers), Marine and fisheries research (38 papers), Climate variability and models (38 papers), Usability and User Interface Design (33 papers), Digital Accessibility for Disabilities (31 papers) and Spatial and Panel Data Analysis (29 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Space and Planetary Science (297 citations), Analytical Chemistry (2.6k citations), Computational Mathematics (133 citations), Media Technology (1.9k citations) and Geochemistry and Petrology (1.1k citations). Authors at Norwegian Computing Center collaborate with scholars in Norway, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, ICES Journal of Marine Science, PLoS ONE, Environmetrics and Geophysics. Some of Norwegian Computing Center's most productive authors include Paul L. M. Geladi, Kim H. Esbensen, Svante Wold, Kjersti Aas, Arnoldo Frigessi, Anne H. Schistad Solberg, Kristen Nygaard, Arnt-Børre Salberg, Claudia Czado and Geir Olve Storvik.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact