Norwegian Computing Center

48.9k citations
1.5k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Norwegian Computing Center

1.3k papers receiving 45.9k citations

Peers

Norwegian Computing Center
Comparison fields: 5 of 242
  • Analytical Chemistry 3.7k
  • Media Technology 2.4k
  • Space and Planetary Science 359
  • Finance 2.2k
  • Statistics and Probability 1.7k
Replace Hochschule für Technik und Wirtschaft Dresden – University of Applied Sciences with:
Hochschule für Technik und Wirtschaft Dresden – University of Applied Sciences Germany
Statistics Sweden Sweden
Statistics Belgium Belgium
Dalle Molle Institute for Artificial Intelligence Research Switzerland
Zuse Institute Berlin Germany
Helsinki Institute for Information Technology Finland
Netherlands Aerospace Centre Netherlands
Transnational University Limburg Belgium
Google DeepMind (United Kingdom) United Kingdom
Centre de Recherche en Mathématiques de la Décision France
Norwegian Computing Center relative to Hochschule für Technik und Wirtschaft Dresden – University of Applied Sciences Germany Hochschule für Technik und Wirtschaft Dresden – University of Applied Sciences's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.6×
Hochschule für Technik und Wirtschaft Dresden – University of Applied Sciences · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Norwegian Computing Center

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Norwegian Computing Center. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Norwegian Computing Center with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Norwegian Computing Center more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Norwegian Computing Center

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Norwegian Computing Center at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Norwegian Computing Center at the time of their publication.

About Norwegian Computing Center

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Norwegian Computing Center have published 1.5k papers, which have received a total of 48.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 73 papers in Statistics and Probability, 131 papers in Ocean Engineering, 20 papers in Human Factors and Ergonomics, 47 papers in Human-Computer Interaction and 70 papers in Media Technology on the topics of Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods (96 papers), Privacy, Security, and Data Protection (53 papers), Soil Geostatistics and Mapping (53 papers), Climate variability and models (46 papers), Remote-Sensing Image Classification (44 papers), Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis (42 papers), Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques (41 papers) and Marine and fisheries research (41 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Analytical Chemistry (3.7k citations), Media Technology (2.4k citations), Space and Planetary Science (359 citations), Finance (2.2k citations) and Statistics and Probability (1.7k citations). Authors at Norwegian Computing Center collaborate with scholars in Norway, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, ICES Journal of Marine Science, PLoS ONE, Environmetrics and Geophysics. Some of Norwegian Computing Center's most productive authors include Paul Geladi, Kim H. Esbensen, Svante Wold, Kjersti Aas, Einar Andreas Rødland, Karin Lagesen, Peter F. Hallin, Torbjørn Rognes, David W. Ussery and Arnoldo Frigessi.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact