National Parks Board

22.4k citations
1.1k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

National Parks Board

1.0k papers receiving 20.8k citations

Peers

National Parks Board
Comparison fields: 5 of 207
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 3.6k
  • Environmental Engineering 3.7k
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 4.8k
  • Ecology 5.1k
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 2.4k
Replace Forest Research Institute Malaysia with:
Forest Research Institute Malaysia Malaysia
Tropical Marine Science Institute Singapore
Forest Department Sarawak Malaysia
Institute of Deep-Sea Science and Engineering China
ICAR - Central Island Agricultural Research Institute India
Institut Marin Borneo Malaysia
Vietnam National University of Forestry Vietnam
Research Institute of Tropical Forestry China
Institute of Marine Geology and Geophysics Vietnam
Guangdong Academy of Forestry China
National Parks Board relative to Forest Research Institute Malaysia Malaysia Forest Research Institute Malaysia's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.9×
Forest Research Institute Malaysia · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at National Parks Board

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at National Parks Board. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at National Parks Board with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Parks Board more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at National Parks Board

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with National Parks Board at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with National Parks Board at the time of their publication.

About National Parks Board

In recent decades, authors affiliated with National Parks Board have published 1.1k papers, which have received a total of 22.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 459 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 129 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 255 papers in Ecology, 33 papers in Ecological Modeling and 272 papers in Plant Science on the topics of Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (303 papers), Plant Diversity and Evolution (295 papers), Plant and animal studies (157 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (85 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (75 papers), Urban Green Space and Health (66 papers), Plant Parasitism and Resistance (57 papers) and Ginger and Zingiberaceae research (55 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (3.6k citations), Environmental Engineering (3.7k citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (4.8k citations), Ecology (5.1k citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (2.4k citations). Authors at National Parks Board collaborate with scholars in Singapore, United Kingdom and United States and have published in prestigious journals including Taxon, Phytotaxa, Urban forestry & urban greening, Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution and ZooKeys. Some of National Parks Board's most productive authors include Subhadip Ghosh, Angelia Sia, I. M. Turner, Nyuk Hien Wong, Peter W. Lucas, Puay Yok Tan, Mohamed Lokman Mohd Yusof, Yu Chen, Lai Fern Ow and M. G. L. Mills.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact