National Metrology Institute of Japan
Impact in
-
- Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
- Analytical Chemistry top 5%
- Analytical chemistry methods development
Papers in
-
- Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation 980
- Radiation 266
- Radioactive Decay and Measurement Techniques 98
- Top scholars
- Yanbei ZhuTetsuya BabaKenichi FujiiFeng-Lei HongHaruhisa KatoKaoru MinoshimaTakashi YagiKoichi Chiba
- Journals
- Metrologia (332 papers)IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement (168 papers)Japanese Journal of Applied Physics (119 papers)Measurement Science and Technology (95 papers)Measurement (56 papers)
- Partner nations
- JapanGermanyUnited States
In The Last Decade
National Metrology Institute of Japan
3.4k papers receiving 47.9k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 193
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 6.1k
- Analytical Chemistry 2.7k
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 7.6k
- Radiation 1.6k
- Spectroscopy 2.6k
Countries citing scholars working at National Metrology Institute of Japan
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at National Metrology Institute of Japan. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at National Metrology Institute of Japan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Metrology Institute of Japan more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at National Metrology Institute of Japan
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with National Metrology Institute of Japan at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with National Metrology Institute of Japan at the time of their publication.
About National Metrology Institute of Japan
In recent decades, authors affiliated with National Metrology Institute of Japan have published 3.7k papers, which have received a total of 48.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 981 papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, 266 papers in Radiation, 223 papers in Analytical Chemistry, 445 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 215 papers in Spectroscopy on the topics of Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation (980 papers), Calibration and Measurement Techniques (292 papers), Advanced Electrical Measurement Techniques (223 papers), Advanced Measurement and Metrology Techniques (212 papers), Analytical chemistry methods development (197 papers), Advanced Frequency and Time Standards (164 papers), Microwave and Dielectric Measurement Techniques (99 papers) and Radioactive Decay and Measurement Techniques (98 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (6.1k citations), Analytical Chemistry (2.7k citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (7.6k citations), Radiation (1.6k citations) and Spectroscopy (2.6k citations). Authors at National Metrology Institute of Japan collaborate with scholars in Japan, Germany and United States and have published in prestigious journals including Metrologia, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, Measurement Science and Technology and Measurement. Some of National Metrology Institute of Japan's most productive authors include Yanbei Zhu, Tetsuya Baba, Kenichi Fujii, Feng-Lei Hong, Haruhisa Kato, Kaoru Minoshima, Takashi Yagi, Koichi Chiba, Akiko Takatsu and Hajime Inaba.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.