National Library of Serbia

4.7k citations
595 papers ·

Impact in

  • Archeology top 10%
    • Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis
    • Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
  • Paleontology top 10%
    • Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
    • Evolution and Paleontology Studies

Papers in

National Library of Serbia

467 papers receiving 4.4k citations

Peers

National Library of Serbia
Comparison fields: 5 of 220
  • Archeology 116
  • Paleontology 742
  • Archeology 628
  • Space and Planetary Science 62
  • Anthropology 366
Replace Historical Archives with:
Historical Archives Hungary
Czech Academy of Sciences, Oriental Institute Czechia
BioSense Institute Serbia
University of Applied Arts Vienna Austria
Albanian University Albania
ANT Foundation Italy Onlus Italy
Swiss Archaeology Switzerland
Nature Conservation Agency Latvia
Lithuanian Ornithological Society Lithuania
Service Public de Wallonie Belgium
National Library of Serbia relative to Historical Archives Hungary Historical Archives's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.1×
Historical Archives · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at National Library of Serbia

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at National Library of Serbia. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at National Library of Serbia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Library of Serbia more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at National Library of Serbia

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with National Library of Serbia at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with National Library of Serbia at the time of their publication.

About National Library of Serbia

In recent decades, authors affiliated with National Library of Serbia have published 595 papers, which have received a total of 4.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 15 papers in Space and Planetary Science, 66 papers in Paleontology, 83 papers in Archeology, 6 papers in Archeology and 41 papers in Finance on the topics of Electromagnetic Scattering and Analysis (48 papers), Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (36 papers), Ancient and Medieval Archaeology Studies (29 papers), Advanced Antenna and Metasurface Technologies (28 papers), Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology (28 papers), Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (28 papers), Electromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods (28 papers) and Evolution and Paleontology Studies (27 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Archeology (116 citations), Paleontology (742 citations), Archeology (628 citations), Space and Planetary Science (62 citations) and Anthropology (366 citations). Authors at National Library of Serbia collaborate with scholars in Serbia, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Palaeobiodiversity and Palaeoenvironments, Natural Product Communications, Phytotaxa, PLoS ONE and Quaternary International. Some of National Library of Serbia's most productive authors include Marjan Niketić, Branko M. Kolundžija, Milan Nedeljković, Silvana Petrović, Gordana Tomović, Branko Urošević, Mirjana Roksandić, Ashoka Mody, Barry Eichengreen and Lucio Sarno.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact