National Institute of Standards
Impact in
- Polymers and Plastics top 5%
- Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties
- Conducting polymers and applications
- Ceramics and Composites top 5%
- Glass properties and applications
Papers in
-
- Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation 214
-
- Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties 163
- Top scholars
- H. MendlowitzA. R. EdmondsWilliam F. MeggersGeorge R. DoddingtonStefan D. LeighPhilip S. KlebanoffB. G. WybourneJames J. Filliben
- Journals
- Physics Today (188 papers)Journal of Applied Polymer Science (57 papers)Soft Matter (55 papers)Microscopy and Microanalysis (55 papers)Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry (54 papers)
- Partner nations
- EgyptUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
National Institute of Standards
4.8k papers receiving 125.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 248
- Polymers and Plastics 10.7k
- Ceramics and Composites 4.2k
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 21.1k
- Materials Chemistry 28.8k
- Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 3.0k
Countries citing scholars working at National Institute of Standards
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at National Institute of Standards. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at National Institute of Standards with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Institute of Standards more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at National Institute of Standards
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with National Institute of Standards at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with National Institute of Standards at the time of their publication.
About National Institute of Standards
In recent decades, authors affiliated with National Institute of Standards have published 5.5k papers, which have received a total of 142.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 242 papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, 447 papers in Polymers and Plastics, 272 papers in Radiation, 154 papers in Ceramics and Composites and 804 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics on the topics of Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation (214 papers), Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties (163 papers), Calibration and Measurement Techniques (161 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (153 papers), Glass properties and applications (120 papers), Advanced Measurement and Metrology Techniques (117 papers), Advanced Sensor Technologies Research (116 papers) and Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques (115 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Polymers and Plastics (10.7k citations), Ceramics and Composites (4.2k citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (21.1k citations), Materials Chemistry (28.8k citations) and Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (3.0k citations). Authors at National Institute of Standards collaborate with scholars in Egypt, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Physics Today, Journal of Applied Polymer Science, Soft Matter, Microscopy and Microanalysis and Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry. Some of National Institute of Standards's most productive authors include H. Mendlowitz, A. R. Edmonds, William F. Meggers, George R. Doddington, Stefan D. Leigh, Philip S. Klebanoff, B. G. Wybourne, James J. Filliben, George H. Weiss and Nour F. Attia.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.