National Institute of Natural Hazards
Impact in
-
- Landslides and related hazards
- Geophysics top 10%
- earthquake and tectonic studies
- Earthquake Detection and Analysis
- Geological and Geochemical Analysis
- High-pressure geophysics and materials
Papers in
- Geophysics 490
- earthquake and tectonic studies 352
- Earthquake Detection and Analysis 186
- Geological and Geochemical Analysis 149
- High-pressure geophysics and materials 139
- Seismic Waves and Analysis 112
-
- Landslides and related hazards 254
- Top scholars
- Chong Bang XuXiwei XuXiaoyi ShaoSiyuan MaHuopo ChenYuandong HuangJiang Da-BangJianqi Sun
- Journals
- Remote Sensing (100 papers)Frontiers in Earth Science (60 papers)Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth (29 papers)Atmosphere (25 papers)Journal of Asian Earth Sciences (25 papers)
- Partner nations
- ChinaUnited StatesItaly
In The Last Decade
National Institute of Natural Hazards
950 papers receiving 9.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 154
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 3.0k
- Geophysics 3.2k
- Atmospheric Science 2.2k
- Global and Planetary Change 2.6k
- Geology 390
Countries citing scholars working at National Institute of Natural Hazards
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at National Institute of Natural Hazards. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at National Institute of Natural Hazards with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Institute of Natural Hazards more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at National Institute of Natural Hazards
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with National Institute of Natural Hazards at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with National Institute of Natural Hazards at the time of their publication.
About National Institute of Natural Hazards
In recent decades, authors affiliated with National Institute of Natural Hazards have published 1.2k papers, which have received a total of 10.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 490 papers in Geophysics, 260 papers in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, 291 papers in Atmospheric Science, 297 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 44 papers in Geology on the topics of earthquake and tectonic studies (352 papers), Landslides and related hazards (254 papers), Earthquake Detection and Analysis (186 papers), Geological and Geochemical Analysis (149 papers), High-pressure geophysics and materials (139 papers), Seismic Waves and Analysis (112 papers), Cryospheric studies and observations (108 papers) and Flood Risk Assessment and Management (103 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (3.0k citations), Geophysics (3.2k citations), Atmospheric Science (2.2k citations), Global and Planetary Change (2.6k citations) and Geology (390 citations). Authors at National Institute of Natural Hazards collaborate with scholars in China, United States and Italy and have published in prestigious journals including Remote Sensing, Frontiers in Earth Science, Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth, Atmosphere and Journal of Asian Earth Sciences. Some of National Institute of Natural Hazards's most productive authors include Chong Bang Xu, Xiwei Xu, Xiaoyi Shao, Siyuan Ma, Huopo Chen, Yuandong Huang, Jiang Da-Bang, Jianqi Sun, Xuhui Shen and Wenwen Qi.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.