National Institute of Health Sciences

266.7k citations
9.3k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

National Institute of Health Sciences

8.7k papers receiving 250.4k citations

Peers

National Institute of Health Sciences
Comparison fields: 5 of 240
  • Cancer Research 26.4k
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 24.6k
  • Toxicology 5.0k
  • Molecular Biology 98.8k
  • Pharmacology 12.2k
Replace University of Shizuoka with:
University of Shizuoka Japan
Teikyo University Japan
Kyoto Pharmaceutical University Japan
Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University Japan
Jichi Medical University Japan
Nippon Medical School Japan
Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine Japan
Tokyo University of Pharmacy and Life Sciences Japan
Hamamatsu University School of Medicine Japan
Takeda (Japan) Japan
National Institute of Health Sciences relative to University of Shizuoka Japan University of Shizuoka's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.7×
University of Shizuoka · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at National Institute of Health Sciences

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at National Institute of Health Sciences. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at National Institute of Health Sciences with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Institute of Health Sciences more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at National Institute of Health Sciences

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with National Institute of Health Sciences at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with National Institute of Health Sciences at the time of their publication.

About National Institute of Health Sciences

In recent decades, authors affiliated with National Institute of Health Sciences have published 9.3k papers, which have received a total of 266.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 1.0k papers in Cancer Research, 519 papers in Pharmacology, 780 papers in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, 3.4k papers in Molecular Biology and 160 papers in Toxicology on the topics of Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (827 papers), Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (400 papers), DNA Repair Mechanisms (337 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (309 papers), Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (294 papers), Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms (228 papers), Mycotoxins in Agriculture and Food (209 papers) and CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (180 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Cancer Research (26.4k citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (24.6k citations), Toxicology (5.0k citations), Molecular Biology (98.8k citations) and Pharmacology (12.2k citations). Authors at National Institute of Health Sciences collaborate with scholars in Japan, United States and Sri Lanka and have published in prestigious journals including Food Hygiene and Safety Science (Shokuhin Eiseigaku Zasshi), Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, Food and Chemical Toxicology and Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin. Some of National Institute of Health Sciences's most productive authors include Mitsuru Uchiyama, Midori Mihara, Kazuhide Inoue, Takehiko Nohmi, Yukihiro Goda, Toshio Sofuni, Makoto Hayashi, Takao Hayakawa, Sumie Yoshioka and Tatsuya Nakano.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact