National Institute of Health and Family Welfare
Impact in
- Reproductive Medicine top 10%
- Sperm and Testicular Function
- Ovarian function and disorders
-
- Reproductive Biology and Fertility
Papers in
-
- Sperm and Testicular Function 63
- Ovarian function and disorders 26
- Health 36
- Top scholars
- Tulsidas G. ShrivastavShail Kumar ChaubeMan Mohan MisroKalyanasundaram KalaivaniDeoki NandanMeenakshi TiwariShilpa PrasadSanjiv Kumar
- Journals
- Contraception (13 papers)Fertility and Sterility (10 papers)APOPTOSIS (8 papers)International Journal of Andrology (6 papers)Clinica Chimica Acta (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- IndiaUnited StatesFinland
In The Last Decade
National Institute of Health and Family Welfare
443 papers receiving 6.9k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 213
- Reproductive Medicine 1.5k
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 1.6k
- Health 433
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 842
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 564
Countries citing scholars working at National Institute of Health and Family Welfare
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at National Institute of Health and Family Welfare. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at National Institute of Health and Family Welfare with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Institute of Health and Family Welfare more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at National Institute of Health and Family Welfare
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with National Institute of Health and Family Welfare at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with National Institute of Health and Family Welfare at the time of their publication.
About National Institute of Health and Family Welfare
In recent decades, authors affiliated with National Institute of Health and Family Welfare have published 570 papers, which have received a total of 9.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 87 papers in Reproductive Medicine, 36 papers in Health, 48 papers in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, 51 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and 67 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health on the topics of Sperm and Testicular Function (63 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (41 papers), Global Maternal and Child Health (39 papers), Hormonal and reproductive studies (38 papers), Child Nutrition and Water Access (27 papers), Ovarian function and disorders (26 papers), Healthcare Systems and Reforms (20 papers) and Estrogen and related hormone effects (17 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Reproductive Medicine (1.5k citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (1.6k citations), Health (433 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (842 citations) and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (564 citations). Authors at National Institute of Health and Family Welfare collaborate with scholars in India, United States and Finland and have published in prestigious journals including Contraception, Fertility and Sterility, APOPTOSIS, International Journal of Andrology and Clinica Chimica Acta. Some of National Institute of Health and Family Welfare's most productive authors include Tulsidas G. Shrivastav, Shail Kumar Chaube, Man Mohan Misro, Kalyanasundaram Kalaivani, Deoki Nandan, Meenakshi Tiwari, Shilpa Prasad, Sanjiv Kumar, Ashutosh N. Pandey and Neeta Kumar.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.