Nebraska Game and Parks Commission

6.1k citations
403 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Nebraska Game and Parks Commission

376 papers receiving 5.9k citations

Peers

Nebraska Game and Parks Commission
Comparison fields: 5 of 174
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 2.9k
  • Aquatic Science 979
  • Ecology 3.2k
  • Ecological Modeling 340
  • Global and Planetary Change 1.6k
Replace Iowa Department of Natural Resources with:
Iowa Department of Natural Resources United States
North Dakota Game and Fish Department United States
Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center United States
Wyoming Game and Fish Department United States
Western EcoSystems Technology (United States) United States
Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center United States
Center for Agricultural Resources Research United States
Ducks Unlimited Canada Canada
Morton Arboretum United States
Minnesota Zoo United States
Nebraska Game and Parks Commission relative to Iowa Department of Natural Resources United States Iowa Department of Natural Resources's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Iowa Department of Natural Resources · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Nebraska Game and Parks Commission

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Nebraska Game and Parks Commission. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Nebraska Game and Parks Commission with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nebraska Game and Parks Commission more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Nebraska Game and Parks Commission

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Nebraska Game and Parks Commission at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Nebraska Game and Parks Commission at the time of their publication.

About Nebraska Game and Parks Commission

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Nebraska Game and Parks Commission have published 403 papers, which have received a total of 6.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 212 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 75 papers in Aquatic Science, 228 papers in Ecology, 24 papers in Ecological Modeling and 86 papers in Global and Planetary Change on the topics of Fish Ecology and Management Studies (184 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (80 papers), Fish Biology and Ecology Studies (70 papers), Avian ecology and behavior (49 papers), Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes (49 papers), Marine and fisheries research (49 papers), Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior (46 papers) and Rangeland and Wildlife Management (34 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Nature and Landscape Conservation (2.9k citations), Aquatic Science (979 citations), Ecology (3.2k citations), Ecological Modeling (340 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (1.6k citations). Authors at Nebraska Game and Parks Commission collaborate with scholars in United States, Canada and China and have published in prestigious journals including North American Journal of Fisheries Management, Journal of Wildlife Management, Journal of Wildlife Diseases, Transactions of the American Fisheries Society and Fisheries. Some of Nebraska Game and Parks Commission's most productive authors include Mark A. Pegg, Larry W. Hesse, Mark P. Vrtiska, Gerald E. Mestl, Kirk D. Steffensen, David W. Willis, Thomas B. Thorson, Larkin Andrew Powell, Loren M. Smith and Keith D. Koupal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact