Norwegian Geotechnical Institute

80.2k citations
2.4k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Norwegian Geotechnical Institute

2.2k papers receiving 77.8k citations

Peers

Norwegian Geotechnical Institute
Comparison fields: 5 of 228
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 17.2k
  • Civil and Structural Engineering 24.9k
  • Pollution 10.4k
  • Earth-Surface Processes 6.2k
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 8.1k
Replace Norsk Hydro (Norway) with:
Norsk Hydro (Norway) Norway
Nordic Laboratory for Luminescence Dating Denmark
Geological Survey of Norway Norway
NILU Norway
Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources Germany
Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland Denmark
Equinor (Norway) Norway
Deltares Netherlands
Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry Germany
Geocenter Denmark Denmark
Norwegian Geotechnical Institute relative to Norsk Hydro (Norway) Norway Norsk Hydro (Norway)'s profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15.0×
Norsk Hydro (Norway) · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Norwegian Geotechnical Institute

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Norwegian Geotechnical Institute. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Norwegian Geotechnical Institute with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Norwegian Geotechnical Institute more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Norwegian Geotechnical Institute

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Norwegian Geotechnical Institute at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Norwegian Geotechnical Institute at the time of their publication.

About Norwegian Geotechnical Institute

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Norwegian Geotechnical Institute have published 2.4k papers, which have received a total of 80.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 951 papers in Civil and Structural Engineering, 508 papers in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, 387 papers in Geophysics, 165 papers in Earth-Surface Processes and 216 papers in Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality on the topics of Landslides and related hazards (492 papers), Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics (460 papers), Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures (431 papers), Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization (281 papers), Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis (211 papers), Cryospheric studies and observations (192 papers), Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact (171 papers) and earthquake and tectonic studies (160 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (17.2k citations), Civil and Structural Engineering (24.9k citations), Pollution (10.4k citations), Earth-Surface Processes (6.2k citations) and Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (8.1k citations). Authors at Norwegian Geotechnical Institute collaborate with scholars in Norway, United States and China and have published in prestigious journals including Environmental Science & Technology, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Advances in natural and technological hazards research, Marine and Petroleum Geology and Géotechnique. Some of Norwegian Geotechnical Institute's most productive authors include Nick Barton, Gerard Cornelissen, Hans Peter H. Arp, Amir M. Kaynia, Vishnu D. Choubey, Sarah E. Hale, Farrokh Nadim, Gijs D. Breedveld, Laurits Bjerrum and Knut H. Andersen.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact