New England Center for Children

14.4k citations
345 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

New England Center for Children

326 papers receiving 13.7k citations

Peers

New England Center for Children
Comparison fields: 5 of 189
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 6.3k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 6.1k
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 2.8k
  • Virology 651
  • Clinical Psychology 2.2k
Replace Arthur M. Sackler Gallery with:
Arthur M. Sackler Gallery United States
Boston University Academy United States
United Cerebral Palsy United States
Bronx Psychiatric Center United States
Applied Behavioral Research (United States) United States
Summit School United States
Stanley Medical Research Institute United States
Husson University United States
Monroe Community Hospital United States
Centre for Applied Genomics Canada
New England Center for Children relative to Arthur M. Sackler Gallery United States Arthur M. Sackler Gallery's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×27.1×
Arthur M. Sackler Gallery · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at New England Center for Children

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at New England Center for Children. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at New England Center for Children with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites New England Center for Children more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at New England Center for Children

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with New England Center for Children at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with New England Center for Children at the time of their publication.

About New England Center for Children

In recent decades, authors affiliated with New England Center for Children have published 345 papers, which have received a total of 14.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 226 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 199 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 96 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health, 31 papers in Statistics and Probability and 16 papers in Virology on the topics of Behavioral and Psychological Studies (221 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (186 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (52 papers), Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (33 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (31 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (18 papers), HIV Research and Treatment (16 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (16 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Developmental and Educational Psychology (6.3k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (6.1k citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (2.8k citations), Virology (651 citations) and Clinical Psychology (2.2k citations). Authors at New England Center for Children collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Australia and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, Behavioral Interventions, Journal of Clinical Investigation, The Journal of Immunology and Research in Developmental Disabilities. Some of New England Center for Children's most productive authors include William H. Ahearn, Murray Sidman, Gina Green, Eileen M. Roscoe, Rebecca P. F. MacDonald, Chikao Morimoto, Stuart F. Schlossman, Norman L. Letvin, Brian A. Iwata and Stephen F. Vatner.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact