National Chemical Laboratory

490.5k citations
16.0k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

    • Chemical Synthesis and Reactions 606
    • Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods 603
    • Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions 674

National Chemical Laboratory

15.3k papers receiving 482.8k citations

Peers

National Chemical Laboratory
Comparison fields: 5 of 237
  • Inorganic Chemistry 64.9k
  • Catalysis 30.4k
  • Organic Chemistry 114.9k
  • Materials Chemistry 184.1k
  • Process Chemistry and Technology 11.2k
Replace Institute of Chemical Technology with:
Institute of Chemical Technology India
Bhabha Atomic Research Centre India
Indian Institute of Chemical Technology India
Central Salt and Marine Chemicals Research Institute India
University of Mumbai India
Jawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research India
Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research India
Council of Scientific and Industrial Research India
Shivaji University India
National Institute for Interdisciplinary Science and Technology India
National Chemical Laboratory relative to Institute of Chemical Technology India Institute of Chemical Technology's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.1×
Institute of Chemical Technology · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at National Chemical Laboratory

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at National Chemical Laboratory. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at National Chemical Laboratory with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Chemical Laboratory more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at National Chemical Laboratory

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with National Chemical Laboratory at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with National Chemical Laboratory at the time of their publication.

About National Chemical Laboratory

In recent decades, authors affiliated with National Chemical Laboratory have published 16.0k papers, which have received a total of 490.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 4.7k papers in Organic Chemistry, 1.1k papers in Catalysis, 1.9k papers in Inorganic Chemistry, 332 papers in Process Chemistry and Technology and 4.7k papers in Materials Chemistry on the topics of Catalytic Processes in Materials Science (883 papers), Mesoporous Materials and Catalysis (700 papers), Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions (674 papers), Zeolite Catalysis and Synthesis (663 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Reactions (606 papers), Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods (603 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (461 papers) and Catalysis for Biomass Conversion (455 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Inorganic Chemistry (64.9k citations), Catalysis (30.4k citations), Organic Chemistry (114.9k citations), Materials Chemistry (184.1k citations) and Process Chemistry and Technology (11.2k citations). Authors at National Chemical Laboratory collaborate with scholars in India, United States and Japan and have published in prestigious journals including Tetrahedron Letters, Tetrahedron, Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Japan, Chemical Communications and RSC Advances. Some of National Chemical Laboratory's most productive authors include Murali Sastry, Rahul Banerjee, Absar Ahmad, P. A. Joy, Chinnakonda S. Gopinath, J. P. Jog, Rajiv Kumar, V.R. Choudhary, Sreekumar Kurungot and Vasant R. Choudhary.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact