National Bureau of Fish Genetic Resources
Impact in
- Aquatic Science top 5%
- Fish Biology and Ecology Studies
- Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth
-
- Fish Ecology and Management Studies
- Fish biology, ecology, and behavior
Papers in
- Aquatic Science 475
- Fish Biology and Ecology Studies 372
- Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth 136
-
- Fish Ecology and Management Studies 188
- Ichthyology and Marine Biology 60
- Top scholars
- W. S. LakraN. S. NagpureT. Raja SwaminathanRavindra KumarUttam Kumar SarkarBasdeo KushwahaAtul K. SinghVindhya Mohindra
- Journals
- Molecular Biology Reports (40 papers)Aquaculture (32 papers)Zootaxa (22 papers)Journal of Fish Biology (21 papers)Fish & Shellfish Immunology (15 papers)
- Partner nations
- IndiaUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
National Bureau of Fish Genetic Resources
820 papers receiving 12.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 167
- Aquatic Science 5.1k
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 2.7k
- Immunology 3.5k
- Physiology 573
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 1.6k
Countries citing scholars working at National Bureau of Fish Genetic Resources
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at National Bureau of Fish Genetic Resources. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at National Bureau of Fish Genetic Resources with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Bureau of Fish Genetic Resources more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at National Bureau of Fish Genetic Resources
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with National Bureau of Fish Genetic Resources at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with National Bureau of Fish Genetic Resources at the time of their publication.
About National Bureau of Fish Genetic Resources
In recent decades, authors affiliated with National Bureau of Fish Genetic Resources have published 909 papers, which have received a total of 12.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 475 papers in Aquatic Science, 258 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 61 papers in Physiology, 226 papers in Immunology and 215 papers in Genetics on the topics of Fish Biology and Ecology Studies (372 papers), Identification and Quantification in Food (239 papers), Aquaculture disease management and microbiota (218 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (188 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (146 papers), Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth (136 papers), Reproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species (61 papers) and Ichthyology and Marine Biology (60 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Aquatic Science (5.1k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (2.7k citations), Immunology (3.5k citations), Physiology (573 citations) and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (1.6k citations). Authors at National Bureau of Fish Genetic Resources collaborate with scholars in India, United States and Australia and have published in prestigious journals including Molecular Biology Reports, Aquaculture, Zootaxa, Journal of Fish Biology and Fish & Shellfish Immunology. Some of National Bureau of Fish Genetic Resources's most productive authors include W. S. Lakra, N. S. Nagpure, T. Raja Swaminathan, Ravindra Kumar, Uttam Kumar Sarkar, Basdeo Kushwaha, Atul K. Singh, Vindhya Mohindra, Kuldeep K. Lal and Gaurav Rathore.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.