MRC Toxicology Unit

156.0k citations
3.7k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

    • Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism 197
    • Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection 125
    • Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment 310

MRC Toxicology Unit

3.4k papers receiving 146.6k citations

Peers

MRC Toxicology Unit
Comparison fields: 5 of 229
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 23.1k
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 17.2k
  • Cancer Research 14.6k
  • Pharmacology 8.8k
  • Molecular Biology 64.3k
Replace AstraZeneca (United Kingdom) with:
AstraZeneca (United Kingdom) United Kingdom
Institut Pasteur de Lille France
London Postgraduate Medical and Dental Education United Kingdom
William Harvey Research Institute United Kingdom
Sanofi (France) France
Janssen (Belgium) Belgium
Centre for Inflammation Research United Kingdom
Pfizer (United Kingdom) United Kingdom
Institut Cochin France
National Cancer Research Institute United Kingdom
MRC Toxicology Unit relative to AstraZeneca (United Kingdom) United Kingdom AstraZeneca (United Kingdom)'s profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
AstraZeneca (United Kingdom) · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at MRC Toxicology Unit

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at MRC Toxicology Unit. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at MRC Toxicology Unit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites MRC Toxicology Unit more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at MRC Toxicology Unit

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with MRC Toxicology Unit at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with MRC Toxicology Unit at the time of their publication.

About MRC Toxicology Unit

In recent decades, authors affiliated with MRC Toxicology Unit have published 3.7k papers, which have received a total of 156.0k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 313 papers in Pharmacology, 399 papers in Cancer Research, 348 papers in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, 182 papers in Biochemistry and 136 papers in Clinical Biochemistry on the topics of Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (310 papers), Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (197 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (181 papers), Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity (181 papers), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (131 papers), Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection (125 papers), Cell death mechanisms and regulation (123 papers) and Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms (117 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (23.1k citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (17.2k citations), Cancer Research (14.6k citations), Pharmacology (8.8k citations) and Molecular Biology (64.3k citations). Authors at MRC Toxicology Unit collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and Italy and have published in prestigious journals including Nature, Biochemical Pharmacology, Chemico-Biological Interactions, Laboratory Animals and Food and Chemical Toxicology. Some of MRC Toxicology Unit's most productive authors include W. N. Aldridge, Gerald M. Cohen, Martin Johnson, Michael F. W. Festing, George Paxinos, L. Magós, J. M. Barnes, Piers C. Emson, Leslie L. Iversen and Charles Watson.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact