Melanoma Institute Australia

118.4k citations
1.8k papers ·

Impact in

  • Oncology top 2%
    • Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
    • Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
    • Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics

Papers in

    • Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management 845
    • Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers 427
    • Cancer survivorship and care 35
    • Polyomavirus and related diseases 25

Melanoma Institute Australia

1.7k papers receiving 118.4k citations

Peers

Melanoma Institute Australia
Comparison fields: 5 of 187
  • Oncology 72.4k
  • Cancer Research 5.6k
  • Molecular Biology 24.7k
  • Immunology 6k
  • Dermatology 2.1k
Replace Cancer Council NSW with:
Cancer Council NSW Australia
The Kinghorn Cancer Centre Australia
Chris O’Brien Lifehouse Australia
Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute Australia
Calvary Mater Newcastle Hospital Australia
Box Hill Hospital Australia
Mater Adult Hospital Australia
Royal Hospital for Women Australia
Blacktown & Mount Druitt Hospital Australia
Australian Red Cross Lifeblood Australia
Melanoma Institute Australia relative to Cancer Council NSW Australia Cancer Council NSW's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10.5×
Cancer Council NSW · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Melanoma Institute Australia

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Melanoma Institute Australia. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Melanoma Institute Australia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Melanoma Institute Australia more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Melanoma Institute Australia

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Melanoma Institute Australia at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Melanoma Institute Australia at the time of their publication.

About Melanoma Institute Australia

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Melanoma Institute Australia have published 1.8k papers, which have received a total of 118.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 1.3k papers in Oncology, 54 papers in Dermatology, 341 papers in Molecular Biology, 55 papers in Cancer Research and 88 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine on the topics of Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management (845 papers), Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers (427 papers), Melanoma and MAPK Pathways (288 papers), Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies (64 papers), Brain Metastases and Treatment (54 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (35 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (31 papers) and Polyomavirus and related diseases (25 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Oncology (72.4k citations), Cancer Research (5.6k citations), Molecular Biology (24.7k citations), Immunology (6k citations) and Dermatology (2.1k citations). Authors at Melanoma Institute Australia collaborate with scholars in Australia, United States and Netherlands and have published in prestigious journals including Annals of Oncology, Annals of Surgical Oncology, European Journal of Cancer, Pathology and British Journal of Dermatology. Some of Melanoma Institute Australia's most productive authors include Georgina Venetia Long, Richard A. Scolyer, John F. Thompson, Alexander Maxwell Menzies, Matteo Salvatore Carlino, Richard F. Kefford, Antoni Ribas, Lauren Elaine Haydu, James S. Wilmott and Helen Rizos.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact