United States Army Medical Command

7k citations
350 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

United States Army Medical Command

330 papers receiving 7k citations

Peers

United States Army Medical Command
Comparison fields: 5 of 181
  • Virology 348
  • Sensory Systems 205
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 178
  • Pharmacology 470
  • Epidemiology 988
Replace U.S. Army Medical Center of Excellence with:
U.S. Army Medical Center of Excellence United States
University Health System United States
Our Lady of the Lake Regional Medical Center United States
St. John Medical Center United States
Oklahoma State University Medical Center United States
Kelsey-Seybold Clinic United States
Springfield Clinic United States
Memorial Medical Center United States
Children's Hospital of San Antonio United States
UnityPoint Health United States
United States Army Medical Command relative to U.S. Army Medical Center of Excellence United States U.S. Army Medical Center of Excellence's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×
U.S. Army Medical Center of Excellence · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at United States Army Medical Command

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at United States Army Medical Command. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at United States Army Medical Command with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites United States Army Medical Command more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at United States Army Medical Command

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with United States Army Medical Command at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with United States Army Medical Command at the time of their publication.

About United States Army Medical Command

In recent decades, authors affiliated with United States Army Medical Command have published 350 papers, which have received a total of 7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 31 papers in Occupational Therapy, 27 papers in Emergency Medical Services, 24 papers in Emergency Medicine, 10 papers in Virology and 14 papers in Parasitology on the topics of Occupational Health and Performance (25 papers), Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (16 papers), Mosquito-borne diseases and control (14 papers), Disaster Response and Management (14 papers), Pharmacy and Medical Practices (14 papers), Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (11 papers), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (11 papers) and Insect Pest Control Strategies (9 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Virology (348 citations), Sensory Systems (205 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (178 citations), Pharmacology (470 citations) and Epidemiology (988 citations). Authors at United States Army Medical Command collaborate with scholars in United States, Canada and Thailand and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Medical Entomology, Military Medicine, Transfusion, High Altitude Medicine & Biology and American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy. Some of United States Army Medical Command's most productive authors include John D. Grabenstein, Stephen A. Harrison, Soumya Gogia, Brent A. Neuschwander‐Tetri, Hays L. Arnold, Mustapha Debboun, Ananda Nisalak, Julie M. Fritz, Philip K. Russell and Scott A. Optenberg.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact