College Station Medical Center
Impact in
- Inorganic Chemistry top 5%
- Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications
-
- Carbon dioxide utilization in catalysis
Papers in
-
- Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications 64
- Top scholars
- Hong-Cai “Joe” ZhouGuoyao WuRichard A. GeyerDonald J. DarensbourgElizabeth A. JosephFrançois P. Gabbaı̈Robert R. BergLiang Feng
- Journals
- Chemical Communications (76 papers)RSC Advances (61 papers)Dalton Transactions (54 papers)Journal of Materials Chemistry A (47 papers)Chemical Science (44 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesChinaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
College Station Medical Center
1.3k papers receiving 50.9k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 243
- Inorganic Chemistry 8.5k
- Process Chemistry and Technology 1.4k
- Materials Chemistry 12.7k
- Organic Chemistry 6.0k
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 4.0k
Countries citing scholars working at College Station Medical Center
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at College Station Medical Center. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at College Station Medical Center with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites College Station Medical Center more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at College Station Medical Center
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with College Station Medical Center at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with College Station Medical Center at the time of their publication.
About College Station Medical Center
In recent decades, authors affiliated with College Station Medical Center have published 1.4k papers, which have received a total of 55.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 125 papers in Inorganic Chemistry, 21 papers in Process Chemistry and Technology, 102 papers in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, 144 papers in Organic Chemistry and 216 papers in Materials Chemistry on the topics of Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications (64 papers), Magnetism in coordination complexes (59 papers), Lanthanide and Transition Metal Complexes (35 papers), Advancements in Battery Materials (34 papers), Covalent Organic Framework Applications (26 papers), Graphene research and applications (24 papers), Conducting polymers and applications (24 papers) and Luminescence and Fluorescent Materials (23 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Inorganic Chemistry (8.5k citations), Process Chemistry and Technology (1.4k citations), Materials Chemistry (12.7k citations), Organic Chemistry (6.0k citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (4.0k citations). Authors at College Station Medical Center collaborate with scholars in United States, China and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Chemical Communications, RSC Advances, Dalton Transactions, Journal of Materials Chemistry A and Chemical Science. Some of College Station Medical Center's most productive authors include Hong-Cai “Joe” Zhou, Guoyao Wu, Richard A. Geyer, Donald J. Darensbourg, Elizabeth A. Joseph, François P. Gabbaı̈, Robert R. Berg, Liang Feng, Michael John Davis and Nattamai Bhuvanesh.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.