Murdoch Children's Research Institute
Impact in
-
- Infant Development and Preterm Care
- Neonatal and fetal brain pathology
- Immunology and Allergy top 0.5%
- Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
Papers in
-
- Infant Development and Preterm Care 496
-
- Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research 460
- Top scholars
- Peter J. AndersonJohn B. CarlinLex William DoyleGeorge PattonBelinda PhipsonMatthew E. RitchieGordon K. SmythYifang Hu
- Journals
- PLoS ONE (300 papers)BMJ Open (247 papers)Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology (222 papers)Vaccine (216 papers)PEDIATRICS (215 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Murdoch Children's Research Institute
18.3k papers receiving 718.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 243
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 57.6k
- Immunology and Allergy 18.1k
- Psychiatry and Mental health 38.4k
- Epidemiology 63k
- Genetics 53.2k
Countries citing scholars working at Murdoch Children's Research Institute
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Murdoch Children's Research Institute. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Murdoch Children's Research Institute with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Murdoch Children's Research Institute more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Murdoch Children's Research Institute
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Murdoch Children's Research Institute at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Murdoch Children's Research Institute at the time of their publication.
About Murdoch Children's Research Institute
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Murdoch Children's Research Institute have published 19.3k papers, which have received a total of 718.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 1.9k papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, 502 papers in Immunology and Allergy, 2.2k papers in Epidemiology, 1.1k papers in Psychiatry and Mental health and 268 papers in Clinical Biochemistry on the topics of Infant Development and Preterm Care (496 papers), Genomics and Rare Diseases (483 papers), Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research (460 papers), Congenital Heart Disease Studies (450 papers), Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (422 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (370 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (362 papers) and Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections (293 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (57.6k citations), Immunology and Allergy (18.1k citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (38.4k citations), Epidemiology (63k citations) and Genetics (53.2k citations). Authors at Murdoch Children's Research Institute collaborate with scholars in Australia, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including PLoS ONE, BMJ Open, Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, Vaccine and PEDIATRICS. Some of Murdoch Children's Research Institute's most productive authors include Peter J. Anderson, John B. Carlin, Lex William Doyle, George Patton, Belinda Phipson, Matthew E. Ritchie, Gordon K. Smyth, Yifang Hu, Di Wu and Wei Shi.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.