March of Dimes

41.3k citations
824 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

March of Dimes

659 papers receiving 31.9k citations

Peers

March of Dimes
Comparison fields: 5 of 233
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 3.6k
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 7.5k
  • Rheumatology 4.6k
  • Reproductive Medicine 1.7k
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 4.6k
Replace American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists with:
American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists United States
American Society of Clinical Oncology United States
Saint Peter's University Hospital United States
Saint Vincent Hospital United States
Renal Research Institute United States
Island Institute United States
International Epidemiology Institute United States
Social and Scientific Systems (United States) United States
Johns Hopkins Children's Center United States
VA Connecticut Research and Education Foundation United States
March of Dimes relative to American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists United States American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.5×
American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at March of Dimes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at March of Dimes. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at March of Dimes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites March of Dimes more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at March of Dimes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with March of Dimes at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with March of Dimes at the time of their publication.

About March of Dimes

In recent decades, authors affiliated with March of Dimes have published 824 papers, which have received a total of 41.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 69 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 160 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, 111 papers in Rheumatology, 19 papers in Urology and 84 papers in Genetics on the topics of Folate and B Vitamins Research (99 papers), Preterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis (46 papers), Congenital Anomalies and Fetal Surgery (44 papers), Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (39 papers), Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (37 papers), Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (35 papers), Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (34 papers) and Cleft Lip and Palate Research (32 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Obstetrics and Gynecology (3.6k citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (7.5k citations), Rheumatology (4.6k citations), Reproductive Medicine (1.7k citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (4.6k citations). Authors at March of Dimes collaborate with scholars in United States, Italy and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Birth Defects Research Part A Clinical and Molecular Teratology, Epidemiology, Maternal and Child Health Journal, American Journal of Epidemiology and American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Some of March of Dimes's most productive authors include Gary M. Shaw, Suzan L. Carmichael, Edward J. Lammer, Cathy R. Wasserman, Salimah R. Walani, Carole R. Mendelson, Lisa Croen, Steve Selvin, Verne Nelson and Joe Leigh Simpson.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact