Laboratoire de Physique Théorique

287.7k citations
8.3k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Laboratoire de Physique Théorique

8.0k papers receiving 284.2k citations

Peers

Laboratoire de Physique Théorique
Comparison fields: 5 of 237
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 108.2k
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 60.6k
  • Condensed Matter Physics 53.4k
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 47.9k
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 77.2k
Replace École Polytechnique with:
École Polytechnique France
Institut de Physique Théorique France
École Normale Supérieure de Lyon France
CEA Paris-Saclay France
Laboratoire de Physique Théorique et Hautes Energies France
Centre de Physique Théorique France
European Organization for Nuclear Research Switzerland
Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats Spain
Institut des Hautes Études Scientifiques France
Scuola Normale Superiore Italy
Laboratoire de Physique Théorique relative to École Polytechnique France École Polytechnique's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
École Polytechnique · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Laboratoire de Physique Théorique

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Laboratoire de Physique Théorique. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Laboratoire de Physique Théorique with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Laboratoire de Physique Théorique more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Laboratoire de Physique Théorique

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Laboratoire de Physique Théorique at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Laboratoire de Physique Théorique at the time of their publication.

About Laboratoire de Physique Théorique

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Laboratoire de Physique Théorique have published 8.3k papers, which have received a total of 287.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 2.8k papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 1.9k papers in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, 1.7k papers in Condensed Matter Physics, 2.5k papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 753 papers in Mathematical Physics on the topics of Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (1.5k papers), Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (1.3k papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (1.2k papers), Theoretical and Computational Physics (1.2k papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (870 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (672 papers), High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (652 papers) and Material Dynamics and Properties (533 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Nuclear and High Energy Physics (108.2k citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (60.6k citations), Condensed Matter Physics (53.4k citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (47.9k citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (77.2k citations). Authors at Laboratoire de Physique Théorique collaborate with scholars in France, United States and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including Physics Letters B, Physical Review Letters, Nuclear Physics B, Journal of High Energy Physics and Physical Review B. Some of Laboratoire de Physique Théorique's most productive authors include Antoine Georges, Pierre-Henri Chavanis, A. Djouadi, Alain Barrat, D. Levesque, Jean‐Philippe Bouchaud, Pierre Le Doussal, B. Guillot, J. J. Weis and G. Parisi.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact