Liverpool John Moores University
Impact in
- Instrumentation top 0.5%
- Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine top 0.2%
- Sports Performance and Training
- Sports injuries and prevention
Papers in
- Instrumentation 768
- Astronomy and Astrophysical Research 762
-
- Sports Performance and Training 860
- Sports injuries and prevention 535
- Top scholars
- E. LeviM CroninGreg AtkinsonThomas ReillyZaili YangAlan NevillA. Mark WilliamsKhalid Rahman
- Journals
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (1.0k papers)PLoS ONE (265 papers)Astronomy and Astrophysics (249 papers)The Astrophysical Journal (220 papers)Journal of Sports Sciences (172 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesChina
In The Last Decade
Liverpool John Moores University
20.7k papers receiving 586.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 251
- Instrumentation 25.9k
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 45.3k
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 67.9k
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 33.0k
- Complementary and alternative medicine 18.2k
Countries citing scholars working at Liverpool John Moores University
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Liverpool John Moores University. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Liverpool John Moores University with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Liverpool John Moores University more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Liverpool John Moores University
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Liverpool John Moores University at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Liverpool John Moores University at the time of their publication.
About Liverpool John Moores University
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Liverpool John Moores University have published 23.9k papers, which have received a total of 645.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 768 papers in Instrumentation, 1.1k papers in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, 2.0k papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 172 papers in Developmental Biology and 908 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology on the topics of Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (1.2k papers), Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (892 papers), Sports Performance and Training (860 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (762 papers), Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (760 papers), Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (566 papers), Sports injuries and prevention (535 papers) and Sport Psychology and Performance (510 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Instrumentation (25.9k citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (45.3k citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (67.9k citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (33.0k citations) and Complementary and alternative medicine (18.2k citations). Authors at Liverpool John Moores University collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and China and have published in prestigious journals including Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, PLoS ONE, Astronomy and Astrophysics, The Astrophysical Journal and Journal of Sports Sciences. Some of Liverpool John Moores University's most productive authors include E. Levi, M Cronin, Greg Atkinson, Thomas Reilly, Zaili Yang, Alan Nevill, A. Mark Williams, Khalid Rahman, Daniel J. Green and Mark A Bellis.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.