Lieber Institute for Brain Development

587 papers receiving 26.7k citations

Peers

Lieber Institute for Brain Development
Comparison fields: 5 of 209
  • Biological Psychiatry 1.8k
  • Developmental Neuroscience 1.3k
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 965
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 4.3k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 4.0k
Replace Jefferson Hospital for Neuroscience with:
Jefferson Hospital for Neuroscience United States
Blanchette Rockefeller Neurosciences Institute United States
Research Foundation For Mental Hygiene United States
Bedford VA Research Corporation United States
Child Health and Development Institute United States
Burke Rehabilitation Hospital United States
Alkermes (United States) United States
Parkinson's Foundation United States
Wm. Jennings Bryan Dorn VA Medical Center United States
Western State Hospital United States
Lieber Institute for Brain Development relative to Jefferson Hospital for Neuroscience United States Jefferson Hospital for Neuroscience's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Jefferson Hospital for Neuroscience · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Lieber Institute for Brain Development

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Lieber Institute for Brain Development. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Lieber Institute for Brain Development with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lieber Institute for Brain Development more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Lieber Institute for Brain Development

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Lieber Institute for Brain Development at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Lieber Institute for Brain Development at the time of their publication.

About Lieber Institute for Brain Development

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Lieber Institute for Brain Development have published 681 papers, which have received a total of 30.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 21 papers in Biological Psychiatry, 32 papers in Developmental Neuroscience, 119 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, 114 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 133 papers in Genetics on the topics of Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (73 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (63 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (55 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (55 papers), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (46 papers), RNA Research and Splicing (40 papers), Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics (38 papers) and Schizophrenia research and treatment (34 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Biological Psychiatry (1.8k citations), Developmental Neuroscience (1.3k citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (965 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (4.3k citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (4.0k citations). Authors at Lieber Institute for Brain Development collaborate with scholars in United States, Italy and China and have published in prestigious journals including Molecular Psychiatry, Journal of Neuroscience, Neuropsychopharmacology, Translational Psychiatry and Biological Psychiatry. Some of Lieber Institute for Brain Development's most productive authors include Daniel R. Weinberger, Andrew E. Jaffe, Jeffrey D. Rothstein, Joel E. Kleinman, Yuan Gao, Thomas M. Hyde, Rafael A. Irizarry, Sriram Kosuri, George M. Church and Yina Ma.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact