Leeds Trinity University

790 papers receiving 14.7k citations

Peers

Leeds Trinity University
Comparison fields: 5 of 215
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 2.2k
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 491
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 1.3k
  • Applied Psychology 336
  • Clinical Psychology 1.2k
Replace Southampton Solent University with:
Southampton Solent University United Kingdom
Plymouth Marjon University United Kingdom
Cumbria Northumberland Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust United Kingdom
Institut National du Sport, de l'Expertise et de la Performance France
University of Cumbria United Kingdom
The Hague University of Applied Sciences Netherlands
Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust United Kingdom
Complexité, Innovation et Activités Motrices et Sportives France
Centre d’études des transformations des activités physiques et sportives France
Health & Safety in Sports Netherlands
Leeds Trinity University relative to Southampton Solent University United Kingdom Southampton Solent University's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10.0×
Southampton Solent University · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Leeds Trinity University

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Leeds Trinity University. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Leeds Trinity University with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leeds Trinity University more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Leeds Trinity University

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Leeds Trinity University at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Leeds Trinity University at the time of their publication.

About Leeds Trinity University

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Leeds Trinity University have published 886 papers, which have received a total of 14.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 90 papers in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, 26 papers in Applied Psychology, 6 papers in Life-span and Life-course Studies, 53 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 59 papers in Clinical Psychology on the topics of Sports Performance and Training (87 papers), Sport Psychology and Performance (33 papers), Physical Activity and Health (26 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (25 papers), Thermoregulation and physiological responses (21 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (21 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (20 papers) and Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior (18 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (2.2k citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (491 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (1.3k citations), Applied Psychology (336 citations) and Clinical Psychology (1.2k citations). Authors at Leeds Trinity University collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, Australia and United States and have published in prestigious journals including The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, Journal of Sports Sciences, PLoS ONE, Frontiers in Psychology and Journal of science and medicine in sport. Some of Leeds Trinity University's most productive authors include Carlton Brian Cooke, Mark A. Russell, John L. Perry, Gillian Ursell, Martin James Barwood, Debbie Michelle Smith, Peter Clough, Lorraine Bowman-Grieve, John Edward Blundell and Trevor F.C. Batten.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact