Korea Institute of Science & Technology Evaluation and Planning
Impact in
Papers in
-
- Technology Assessment and Management 28
- Top scholars
- Chankook ParkWoo Seok KangSang Hee HongUnhae LeeJeong‐Dong LeeJin Myung ParkY. KimJou‐Hyeon Ahn
- Journals
- Journal of Open Innovation Technology Market and Complexity (11 papers)Technological Forecasting and Social Change (10 papers)Sustainability (7 papers)Scientometrics (6 papers)Science and Public Policy (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- South KoreaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Korea Institute of Science & Technology Evaluation and Planning
330 papers receiving 5.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 215
- Management of Technology and Innovation 288
- Business and International Management 64
- Management Science and Operations Research 347
- Strategy and Management 426
- Economics and Econometrics 657
Countries citing scholars working at Korea Institute of Science & Technology Evaluation and Planning
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Korea Institute of Science & Technology Evaluation and Planning. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Korea Institute of Science & Technology Evaluation and Planning with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Korea Institute of Science & Technology Evaluation and Planning more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Korea Institute of Science & Technology Evaluation and Planning
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Korea Institute of Science & Technology Evaluation and Planning at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Korea Institute of Science & Technology Evaluation and Planning at the time of their publication.
About Korea Institute of Science & Technology Evaluation and Planning
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Korea Institute of Science & Technology Evaluation and Planning have published 372 papers, which have received a total of 5.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 30 papers in Management of Technology and Innovation, 29 papers in Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, 40 papers in Management Science and Operations Research, 82 papers in Economics and Econometrics and 9 papers in Public Administration on the topics of Innovation Policy and R&D (48 papers), Technology Assessment and Management (28 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (24 papers), Firm Innovation and Growth (21 papers), Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting (20 papers), Technology and Data Analysis (17 papers), Economic Growth and Productivity (13 papers) and Evaluation and Performance Assessment (13 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Management of Technology and Innovation (288 citations), Business and International Management (64 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (347 citations), Strategy and Management (426 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (657 citations). Authors at Korea Institute of Science & Technology Evaluation and Planning collaborate with scholars in South Korea, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Open Innovation Technology Market and Complexity, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Sustainability, Scientometrics and Science and Public Policy. Some of Korea Institute of Science & Technology Evaluation and Planning's most productive authors include Chankook Park, Woo Seok Kang, Sang Hee Hong, Unhae Lee, Jeong‐Dong Lee, Jin Myung Park, Y. Kim, Jou‐Hyeon Ahn, Ki-Won Kim and Hyo‐Jun Ahn.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.