Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety

1.2k papers receiving 14.2k citations

Peers

Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety
Comparison fields: 5 of 204
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 1.9k
  • Metals and Alloys 421
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 1.2k
  • Radiation 1.1k
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 848
Replace National Institute for Radiological Protection with:
National Institute for Radiological Protection China
Nuclear and Radiation Safety Center China
Institute of Oceanographic Instrumentation China
J-Power (Japan) Japan
Hyundai Heavy Industries (South Korea) South Korea
National Maritime Research Institute Japan
China Academy of Safety Sciences and Technology China
Japan Research Institute Japan
Osaka Sangyo University Japan
Takenaka (Japan) Japan
Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety relative to National Institute for Radiological Protection China National Institute for Radiological Protection's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.9×
National Institute for Radiological Protection · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety at the time of their publication.

About Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety have published 1.3k papers, which have received a total of 14.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 154 papers in Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, 154 papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, 197 papers in Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, 168 papers in Radiation and 38 papers in Metals and Alloys on the topics of Nuclear Engineering Thermal-Hydraulics (168 papers), Nuclear and radioactivity studies (154 papers), Nuclear reactor physics and engineering (141 papers), Nuclear Materials and Properties (140 papers), Radioactivity and Radon Measurements (137 papers), Risk and Safety Analysis (132 papers), Radioactive contamination and transfer (118 papers) and Fatigue and fracture mechanics (116 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (1.9k citations), Metals and Alloys (421 citations), Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (1.2k citations), Radiation (1.1k citations) and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (848 citations). Authors at Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety collaborate with scholars in South Korea, United States and Japan and have published in prestigious journals including Nuclear Engineering and Technology, Nuclear Engineering and Design, Annals of Nuclear Energy, Applied Radiation and Isotopes and Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry. Some of Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety's most productive authors include Moo Hwan Kim, Myung Jo Jhung, Sung-Sik Kang, Chang‐Kyu Kim, Rodrigo Salgado, Mônica Prezzi, Bumjoo Kim, Hyun Sun Park, Kun Jai Lee and Byung-Uck Chang.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact