King Fahd Medical City

3.9k papers receiving 60.8k citations

Peers

King Fahd Medical City
Comparison fields: 5 of 218
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 637
  • Neurology 3k
  • Infectious Diseases 3.9k
  • Clinical Biochemistry 986
  • Epidemiology 4.7k
Replace King Abdulaziz Medical City with:
King Abdulaziz Medical City Saudi Arabia
Riyadh Armed Forces Hospital Saudi Arabia
King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences Saudi Arabia
King Khalid University Hospital Saudi Arabia
Hamad Medical Corporation Qatar
Weill Cornell Medical College in Qatar Qatar
King Saud Medical City Saudi Arabia
Sultan Qaboos University Hospital Oman
Shaare Zedek Medical Center Israel
Children's Medical Center Iran
King Fahd Medical City relative to King Abdulaziz Medical City Saudi Arabia King Abdulaziz Medical City's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
King Abdulaziz Medical City · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at King Fahd Medical City

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at King Fahd Medical City. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at King Fahd Medical City with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites King Fahd Medical City more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at King Fahd Medical City

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with King Fahd Medical City at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with King Fahd Medical City at the time of their publication.

About King Fahd Medical City

In recent decades, authors affiliated with King Fahd Medical City have published 4.3k papers, which have received a total of 60.8k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 69 papers in Clinical Biochemistry, 197 papers in Neurology, 32 papers in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 39 papers in Internal Medicine and 208 papers in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism on the topics of COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies (96 papers), Genomics and Rare Diseases (67 papers), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (66 papers), Epilepsy research and treatment (61 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (54 papers), SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research (50 papers), Vitamin D Research Studies (47 papers) and Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (43 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (637 citations), Neurology (3k citations), Infectious Diseases (3.9k citations), Clinical Biochemistry (986 citations) and Epidemiology (4.7k citations). Authors at King Fahd Medical City collaborate with scholars in Saudi Arabia, United States and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including PLoS ONE, World Neurosurgery, Journal of Infection and Public Health, Frontiers in Pediatrics and International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. Some of King Fahd Medical City's most productive authors include Imad M. Tleyjeh, Abdullah Sulieman Terkawi, Siny Tsang, Ayman W. El‐Hattab, Colin Forbes Royse, Wolfgang J. Streit, Manuel B. Graeber, Mohamad A. Al-Tannir, Eissa Faqeih and Larry M. Baddour.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact