Institute of Applied Physics

16.6k citations
737 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Institute of Applied Physics

666 papers receiving 16.2k citations

Peers

Institute of Applied Physics
Comparison fields: 5 of 187
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 4.2k
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 5.5k
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics 159
  • Materials Chemistry 5.4k
  • Biomedical Engineering 4.3k
Replace Changji University with:
Changji University China
Kashi University China
Ural Institute of Metals Russia
Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Russia
National Pedagogical University of Uzbekistan Uzbekistan
Institute of Physics of Molecules and Crystals Russia
Joint Laboratory for Extreme Conditions Matter Properties China
Buryat State University Russia
STMicroelectronics (India) India
Institute of Physical Materials Science Russia
Institute of Applied Physics relative to Changji University China Changji University's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×39.8×
Changji University · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Institute of Applied Physics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Institute of Applied Physics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Institute of Applied Physics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Institute of Applied Physics more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Institute of Applied Physics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Institute of Applied Physics at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Institute of Applied Physics at the time of their publication.

About Institute of Applied Physics

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Institute of Applied Physics have published 737 papers, which have received a total of 16.6k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 9 papers in Acoustics and Ultrasonics, 234 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 123 papers in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, 221 papers in Materials Chemistry and 49 papers in Condensed Matter Physics on the topics of Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies (55 papers), 2D Materials and Applications (49 papers), Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research (49 papers), Photonic and Optical Devices (46 papers), Metamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications (41 papers), Photorefractive and Nonlinear Optics (39 papers), Graphene research and applications (38 papers) and Perovskite Materials and Applications (38 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (4.2k citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (5.5k citations), Acoustics and Ultrasonics (159 citations), Materials Chemistry (5.4k citations) and Biomedical Engineering (4.3k citations). Authors at Institute of Applied Physics collaborate with scholars in Russia, China and United States and have published in prestigious journals including Laser & Photonics Review, Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, Nanoscale, Scientific Reports and Optics Express. Some of Institute of Applied Physics's most productive authors include Jianguo Tian, E. L. Wolf, Jingjun Xu, Shuqi Chen, Hua Cheng, Zhibo Liu, Steven M. Block, Robert Landick, Zhigang Chen and Zhancheng Li.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact