Joint Nature Conservation Committee
Impact in
- Ecology top 10%
- Avian ecology and behavior
- Marine animal studies overview
- Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Ecological Modeling top 10%
Papers in
- Ecology 203
- Avian ecology and behavior 114
- Marine animal studies overview 59
- Wildlife Ecology and Conservation 23
-
- Species Distribution and Climate Change 17
- Top scholars
- Mark L. TaskerRW FurnessDavid A. StroudPaul WoodcockWilliam J. SutherlandSarah WanlessNeil EllisDavid B. Roy
- Journals
- Biological Conservation (23 papers)Frontiers in Marine Science (15 papers)Ibis (14 papers)ICES Journal of Marine Science (13 papers)Aquatic Conservation Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems (11 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesFrance
In The Last Decade
Joint Nature Conservation Committee
386 papers receiving 14k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 172
- Ecology 5.8k
- Ecological Modeling 561
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 1.7k
- Global and Planetary Change 3.2k
- Oceanography 1.4k
Countries citing scholars working at Joint Nature Conservation Committee
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Joint Nature Conservation Committee. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Joint Nature Conservation Committee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joint Nature Conservation Committee more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Joint Nature Conservation Committee
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Joint Nature Conservation Committee at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Joint Nature Conservation Committee at the time of their publication.
About Joint Nature Conservation Committee
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Joint Nature Conservation Committee have published 397 papers, which have received a total of 14.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 203 papers in Ecology, 17 papers in Ecological Modeling, 66 papers in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, 55 papers in Oceanography and 37 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation on the topics of Avian ecology and behavior (114 papers), Marine animal studies overview (59 papers), Coastal and Marine Management (48 papers), Marine Biology and Ecology Research (45 papers), Marine and fisheries research (36 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (24 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (23 papers) and Species Distribution and Climate Change (17 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Ecology (5.8k citations), Ecological Modeling (561 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (1.7k citations), Global and Planetary Change (3.2k citations) and Oceanography (1.4k citations). Authors at Joint Nature Conservation Committee collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and France and have published in prestigious journals including Biological Conservation, Frontiers in Marine Science, Ibis, ICES Journal of Marine Science and Aquatic Conservation Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems. Some of Joint Nature Conservation Committee's most productive authors include Mark L. Tasker, RW Furness, David A. Stroud, Paul Woodcock, William J. Sutherland, Sarah Wanless, Neil Ellis, David B. Roy, Morten Frederiksen and Colin A. Galbraith.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.