Joint Institute for High Temperatures
Impact in
- Computational Mechanics top 2%
-
- Dust and Plasma Wave Phenomena
Papers in
-
- Dust and Plasma Wave Phenomena 672
- Top scholars
- G V NaĭdisLeonid A. DombrovskyBoris M. SmirnovВ. Е. ФортовG. I. KanelV. А. MarchenkoVladimir StegailovS. A. Khrapak
- Journals
- High Temperature (804 papers)Physics of Plasmas (165 papers)Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics Letters (142 papers)Journal of Physics D Applied Physics (106 papers)The Journal of Chemical Physics (87 papers)
- Partner nations
- RussiaGermanyUnited States
In The Last Decade
Joint Institute for High Temperatures
7.1k papers receiving 83.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 210
- Computational Mechanics 15.2k
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 21.0k
- Geophysics 8.6k
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 6.8k
- Mechanics of Materials 12.4k
Countries citing scholars working at Joint Institute for High Temperatures
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Joint Institute for High Temperatures. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Joint Institute for High Temperatures with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joint Institute for High Temperatures more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Joint Institute for High Temperatures
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Joint Institute for High Temperatures at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Joint Institute for High Temperatures at the time of their publication.
About Joint Institute for High Temperatures
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Joint Institute for High Temperatures have published 7.7k papers, which have received a total of 85.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 2.2k papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 1.5k papers in Computational Mechanics, 892 papers in Geophysics, 700 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics and 1.2k papers in Mechanics of Materials on the topics of High-pressure geophysics and materials (717 papers), Dust and Plasma Wave Phenomena (672 papers), Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (581 papers), Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (541 papers), Plasma Diagnostics and Applications (523 papers), Combustion and Detonation Processes (428 papers), Plasma Applications and Diagnostics (413 papers) and nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions (368 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Computational Mechanics (15.2k citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (21.0k citations), Geophysics (8.6k citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (6.8k citations) and Mechanics of Materials (12.4k citations). Authors at Joint Institute for High Temperatures collaborate with scholars in Russia, Germany and United States and have published in prestigious journals including High Temperature, Physics of Plasmas, Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics Letters, Journal of Physics D Applied Physics and The Journal of Chemical Physics. Some of Joint Institute for High Temperatures's most productive authors include G V Naĭdis, Leonid A. Dombrovsky, Boris M. Smirnov, В. Е. Фортов, G. I. Kanel, V. А. Marchenko, Vladimir Stegailov, S. A. Khrapak, A. Yu. Varaksin and K. V. Khishchenko.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.