Joint BioEnergy Institute

88.3k citations
1.6k papers ·

Impact in

    • Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
    • Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization
    • Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis
    • CRISPR and Genetic Engineering

Papers in

Joint BioEnergy Institute

1.5k papers receiving 82.4k citations

Peers

Joint BioEnergy Institute
Comparison fields: 5 of 213
  • Biotechnology 7.2k
  • Molecular Biology 48.5k
  • Biomedical Engineering 30.6k
  • Plant Science 18.1k
  • Biomaterials 5.2k
Replace Energy Biosciences Institute with:
Energy Biosciences Institute United States
Molecular Sciences Institute United States
Membrane Technology & Research (United States) United States
Bio-Rad (United States) United States
Research International (United States) United States
Abterra Biosciences (United States) United States
Ministry of Agriculture Canada
Western Human Nutrition Research Center United States
National Institute for Nanotechnology Canada
U.S. Arid Land Agricultural Research Center United States
Joint BioEnergy Institute relative to Energy Biosciences Institute United States Energy Biosciences Institute's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Energy Biosciences Institute · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Joint BioEnergy Institute

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Joint BioEnergy Institute. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Joint BioEnergy Institute with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joint BioEnergy Institute more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Joint BioEnergy Institute

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Joint BioEnergy Institute at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Joint BioEnergy Institute at the time of their publication.

About Joint BioEnergy Institute

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Joint BioEnergy Institute have published 1.6k papers, which have received a total of 88.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 138 papers in Biotechnology, 602 papers in Biomedical Engineering, 893 papers in Molecular Biology, 324 papers in Plant Science and 118 papers in Pharmacology on the topics of Biofuel production and bioconversion (487 papers), Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction (434 papers), Lignin and Wood Chemistry (137 papers), Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis (121 papers), Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization (120 papers), Catalysis for Biomass Conversion (117 papers), Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (110 papers) and Polysaccharides and Plant Cell Walls (103 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Biotechnology (7.2k citations), Molecular Biology (48.5k citations), Biomedical Engineering (30.6k citations), Plant Science (18.1k citations) and Biomaterials (5.2k citations). Authors at Joint BioEnergy Institute collaborate with scholars in United States, Denmark and China and have published in prestigious journals including Metabolic Engineering, Biotechnology for Biofuels, ACS Synthetic Biology, Green Chemistry and PLoS ONE. Some of Joint BioEnergy Institute's most productive authors include Jay D. Keasling, Blake A. Simmons, Henrik Vibe Scheller, Seema Singh, Peter Ulvskov, Steven W. Singer, Aindrila Mukhopadhyay, Taek Soon Lee, Christopher J. Petzold and Fuzhong Zhang.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact