Jülich Aachen Research Alliance

168.3k citations
4.8k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Jülich Aachen Research Alliance

4.5k papers receiving 157.3k citations

Peers

Jülich Aachen Research Alliance
Comparison fields: 5 of 238
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 33.2k
  • Automotive Engineering 15.3k
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 53.7k
  • Materials Chemistry 37.1k
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 13.9k
Replace Chemnitz University of Technology with:
Chemnitz University of Technology Germany
IMEC Belgium
Technische Universität Ilmenau Germany
ESPCI Paris France
Institut des Sciences Moléculaires France
Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology Germany
Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies Germany
Ernst Ruska Centre Germany
NXP (Netherlands) Netherlands
Hochschule Bielefeld Germany
Jülich Aachen Research Alliance relative to Chemnitz University of Technology Germany Chemnitz University of Technology's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.9×
Chemnitz University of Technology · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Jülich Aachen Research Alliance

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Jülich Aachen Research Alliance. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Jülich Aachen Research Alliance with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jülich Aachen Research Alliance more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Jülich Aachen Research Alliance

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Jülich Aachen Research Alliance at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Jülich Aachen Research Alliance at the time of their publication.

About Jülich Aachen Research Alliance

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Jülich Aachen Research Alliance have published 4.8k papers, which have received a total of 168.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 926 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 339 papers in Condensed Matter Physics, 830 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 315 papers in Automotive Engineering and 1.4k papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering on the topics of Neural dynamics and brain function (421 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (409 papers), Quantum and electron transport phenomena (344 papers), Advanced Battery Technologies Research (305 papers), Advancements in Battery Materials (273 papers), Advanced Memory and Neural Computing (259 papers), Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies (204 papers) and Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides (193 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Cognitive Neuroscience (33.2k citations), Automotive Engineering (15.3k citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (53.7k citations), Materials Chemistry (37.1k citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (13.9k citations). Authors at Jülich Aachen Research Alliance collaborate with scholars in Germany, United States and Netherlands and have published in prestigious journals including Physical review. B., NeuroImage, Physical Review B, Scientific Reports and Physical Review Letters. Some of Jülich Aachen Research Alliance's most productive authors include Dirk Uwe Sauer, Simon Bodo Eickhoff, Karl Zilles, Rainer M. Waser, Richard Dronskowski, Volker L. Deringer, Angela R. Laird, Katrin Amunts, Matthias Wuttig and Danilo Bzdok.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact