Institute of Physics

1.2M citations
29.4k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Institute of Physics

28.2k papers receiving 1.1M citations

Peers

Institute of Physics
Comparison fields: 5 of 226
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 177.5k
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 218.8k
  • Condensed Matter Physics 81.2k
  • Materials Chemistry 276.6k
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 97.1k
Replace Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences with:
Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences China
Institute of Chemistry China
National Laboratory of Solid State Microstructures
Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Microstructures China
Collaborative Innovation Center of Quantum Matter China
National Center for Nanoscience and Technology China
Institute of Semiconductors China
Technical Institute of Physics and Chemistry China
State Key Laboratory of Crystal Materials
Institute of High Energy Physics China
Institute of Physics relative to Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences China Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15×17.8×
Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Institute of Physics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Institute of Physics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Institute of Physics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Institute of Physics more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Institute of Physics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Institute of Physics at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Institute of Physics at the time of their publication.

About Institute of Physics

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Institute of Physics have published 29.4k papers, which have received a total of 1.2M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 5.7k papers in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, 4k papers in Condensed Matter Physics, 7.6k papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 6.7k papers in Materials Chemistry and 203 papers in Structural Biology on the topics of Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (2.3k papers), Magnetic properties of thin films (1.7k papers), Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials (1.6k papers), Topological Materials and Phenomena (1.6k papers), Advancements in Battery Materials (1.3k papers), 2D Materials and Applications (1.2k papers), Magnetic Properties of Alloys (1k papers) and Iron-based superconductors research (1k papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (177.5k citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (218.8k citations), Condensed Matter Physics (81.2k citations), Materials Chemistry (276.6k citations) and Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (97.1k citations). Authors at Institute of Physics collaborate with scholars in China, United States and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including Applied Physics Letters, Physical review. B., Chinese Physics Letters, Physical Review B and Journal of Applied Physics. Some of Institute of Physics's most productive authors include Liquan Chen, Hong Li, Lin Gu, Yong‐Sheng Hu, Xi Dai, Zhong Fang, Xuejie Huang, Qinghua Zhang, Zhaoxiang Wang and Wei Hua Wang.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact